TaG use “answer” broadly, covering both direct answers to information-seeking questions and indirect dialogue moves based on pragmatic inference or implicature.

Evidence (2)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Answerhood evidence and the distinction between answers and narrative replies

think of ‘ answer ’ as encompassing direct answers to information-seeking questions but also other answering strategies via more indirect moves in a dialogue

https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-3-p1

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Answerhood evidence and the distinction between answers and narrative replies

think of ‘ answer ’ as encompassing direct answers to information-seeking questions but also other answering strategies via more indirect moves in a dialogue

https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-3-p1

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/39e02837161a26157b9e9acbd75f54bd7d2a6a58f271861c5014d07d13e6171a"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.