Claim39e02837161a26157b9e9acbd75f54bd7d2a6a58f271861c5014d07d13e6171a·Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood

Claim

TaG use “answer” broadly, covering both direct answers to information-seeking questions and indirect dialogue moves based on pragmatic inference or implicature.

Evidence (2)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Answerhood evidence and the distinction between answers and narrative replies
think of ‘ answer ’ as encompassing direct answers to information-seeking questions but also other answering strategies via more indirect moves in a dialogue
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-3-p1
Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Answerhood evidence and the distinction between answers and narrative replies
think of ‘ answer ’ as encompassing direct answers to information-seeking questions but also other answering strategies via more indirect moves in a dialogue
https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-3-p1

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/39e02837161a26157b9e9acbd75f54bd7d2a6a58f271861c5014d07d13e6171a"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond