The underdetermination sceptical paradox combines the claims that no support favours everyday perceptual proposition E over incompatible sceptical hypothesis H, that lacking such favouring support precludes rationally grounded perceptual knowledge, and that widespread perceptual knowledge exists.
Evidence (2)
An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge — Pritchardean perceptual disjunctivism: formulation, advantages, and responses to its standard problems
each of the statements in the underdetermination-based sceptical paradox regarding perceptual knowledge is plausible
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/abs/an-epistemological-disjunctivist-account-of-memory-knowledge/14B783777BF7638A1B1D2F20750466D7#unit-2-p5
An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge — Pritchardean perceptual disjunctivism: formulation, advantages, and responses to its standard problems
each of the statements in the underdetermination-based sceptical paradox regarding perceptual knowledge is plausible
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/abs/an-epistemological-disjunctivist-account-of-memory-knowledge/14B783777BF7638A1B1D2F20750466D7#unit-2-p5
Respond to this claim on Isonomia
Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.