Claim27a29ee30d88c2a4ce607de8b53d87bf15cc8fba6ace086e9f31a5a33c9997dc·Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood

Claim

Trotzke's 2019 examples are limited to exclamatives with explicitly gradable elements, so their findings cannot straightforwardly be generalized to all exclamatives.

Evidence (1)

Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood — Synthesis: limits of TaG’s argument and need for further support

the examples considered in Trotzke ’ s (2019) study are limited to those with explicitly gradable elements

https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2006#unit-5-p3

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/27a29ee30d88c2a4ce607de8b53d87bf15cc8fba6ace086e9f31a5a33c9997dc"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond