The proposed precautionary measures — phone bans, age-gated platforms, forced default-private accounts — are not in fact low-cost. They impose disproportionate burdens on low-income adolescents (for whom a smartphone is often the household's only persistent internet device) and on adolescent developmental autonomy more broadly. The "low side-effect" framing of the synthesis is therefore incorrect on its own terms.
Evidence (1)
Dialectical view
Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it. Each side may be empty — that is honest, not absent.
Arguments for (1)
Arguments against (0)
No structural counter-arguments are on file.
Respond to this claim on Isonomia
Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.