Claim221d2791d98e70e019ba3c180e03270bc2d9b2e9fc82b86ce20bba70be0400f0·Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?

Claim

Husserl's own pure/empirical-Ego distinction concedes that the transcendental Ego splits into objectified and not-objectified.

Evidence (3)

How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Natorp and Husserl Reconsidered: The Split Within Reflection
psychology which seeks to convince itself that it is not psychology.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263
How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Natorp and Husserl Reconsidered: The Split Within Reflection
psychology which seeks to convince itself that it is not psychology.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263#unit-6-p1
How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Natorp and Husserl Reconsidered: The Split Within Reflection
science of all sciences.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263#unit-6-p4

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/221d2791d98e70e019ba3c180e03270bc2d9b2e9fc82b86ce20bba70be0400f0"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberationJoin & respond