Guess et al. (2023) null findings on affective polarization do not rule out algorithmic effects below the study's detectable threshold or effects on non-volunteer subpopulations; absence-of-evidence arguments require specification of minimum detectable effect size.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it. Each side may be empty — that is honest, not absent.

Arguments for (1)

Guess et al. (2023) null findings on affective polarization do not rule out algorithmic effects below the study's detectable threshold or effects on non-volunteer subpopulations; absence-of-evidence auntested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim →

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/1e88599814521f310f5ef10b013d896e33b4bee348a23b060f7eea7a8fbb2a00"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.