Claim1a7cc60d50b3f57f1386967726ba9f60e71b40af632941f1cba7b3fd579448f9

Claim

The Bail et al. (2018) backfire effect demonstrates that cross-partisan exposure can increase polarization independently of algorithmic curation, supporting the inference that polarization from such exposure is not attributable to algorithms specifically.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

The Bail et al. (2018) backfire effect demonstrates that cross-partisan exposure can increase polarization independently of algorithmic curation, supporting the inference that polarization from such euntested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/1a7cc60d50b3f57f1386967726ba9f60e71b40af632941f1cba7b3fd579448f9"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond