Pritchard's ED-P has three theoretical advantages: it accommodates internalist and externalist intuitions, fits ordinary belief-justification practices, and addresses underdetermination-based radical scepticism.

Evidence (1)

An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge — Conclusion: defence of a unified ED-M for paradigmatic memory knowledge

Pritchard ’ s ED-P has three theoretical advantages – it satisfies both internalist and externalist intuitions in epistemology, fits common practices in justifying beliefs, and offers a satisfactory way to cope with underdetermination-based radical scepticism.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/abs/an-epistemological-disjunctivist-account-of-memory-knowledge/14B783777BF7638A1B1D2F20750466D7#unit-6-p1

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/1726f654fa2b28cdd5cc2add731835d5f48d3e43f26c93c53ceb14023d0597cd"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.