Because the access and distinguishability problems arise from disjunctivism's general commitment, ED-M can answer them in ways parallel to ED-P; and because remembering that p need not entail believing or knowing that p, its basis problem is dissolved.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it. Each side may be empty — that is honest, not absent.

Arguments for (1)

Because the access and distinguishability problems arise from disjunctivism's general commitment, ED-M can answer them in ways parallel to ED-P; and because remembering that p need not entail believinuntested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim →

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

Join & respond

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/164408964bf8076dc2817f49652ba4c0fdae7cc4ab5760924d572c3c3a781460"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.