Claim0db4a41f68dd566563d68f95d2a9223b807168344abdfc87dda2bf3d5f3f08a4·Paper reconstruction — Andreas Trotzke & Anastasia Giannakidou (2024), Exclamation, intensity, and emotive assertion

Claim

The alleged non-deniability of exclamative descriptive content fails, because such content can be targeted by broad denial strategies and is experimentally supported as at issue.

Dialectical view

Public arguments concluding to this claim, and structural counter-arguments that contest it.

Arguments for (1)

The alleged non-deniability of exclamative descriptive content fails, because such content can be targeted by broad denial strategies and is experimentally supported as at issue.untested-default

Arguments against (0)

No structural counter-arguments are on file.

Browse all counter-arguments to this claim

Embed this claim

<iframe
  src="https://www.isonomia.app/embed/claim/0db4a41f68dd566563d68f95d2a9223b807168344abdfc87dda2bf3d5f3f08a4"
  width="600"
  height="280"
  frameborder="0"
  style="border: 1px solid #e5e7eb; border-radius: 8px;"
  title="Isonomia Claim"
  loading="lazy"
></iframe>

Copy and paste into any website or forum that supports HTML.

Respond to this claim on Isonomia

Build or challenge arguments with structured reasoning in the Digital Agora.

View full deliberation Join & respond