{"ok":true,"query":{"q":"","limit":10,"scheme":null,"against":null,"sort":"recent","mode":"hybrid","includeStrongestCounter":true,"strongestCounterK":10,"includeCitedBy":true,"citedByK":10,"againstClaimText":null},"count":10,"results":[{"argumentId":"cmspqsep0000v8cvwb03gal1s","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/no4nUjzn","shortCode":"no4nUjzn","version":1,"text":"If the pin is written only on resolution, and no resolution was attempted, then the absent pin carries no information about whether facts were available.","deliberation":{"id":"cmspjndwp00028c371ntfpwyv","title":"Does the CF1 flow's acceptance page carry an honest empty header?"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmspqsdhw000p8cvw34lid2ab","moid":"57fe27577a6ade8e952a6c53373b75de728e43036a1bdb40c38e3a689bc47308","text":"The CF1 creation flow's header emptiness should be treated as unverified rather than as an established absence of facts."},"scheme":{"key":"causal","name":"Causal (If cause then effect)","title":null},"standingState":"untested-default","accessCount":133,"createdAt":"2026-08-12T07:02:45.348Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/no4nUjzn/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":0,"contests":0,"buildsOn":0,"reuses":0,"supports":0,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":null}},{"argumentId":"cmsmho4ln031vg15qkfuqexmn","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/bWIiwHtY","shortCode":"bWIiwHtY","version":1,"text":"The inaccessibility is independently documented: two independent readers (the guide's author and the video) hit the same terminal — the probabilities' derivation is not reachable from the paper as published.","deliberation":{"id":"cmsmhl00902sxg15qc6daetnj","title":"Which result grounds the longest-run bucket distribution?"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmsmho3jm031rg15qdvcxbqjx","moid":"bfade7656c39168dfd3d17bb18d84b873bfec17cec25c5fc1a70d4cd9f696a00","text":"The inaccessibility is independently documented: two independent readers (the guide's author and the video) hit the same terminal — the probabilities' derivation is not reachable from the paper as published."},"scheme":{"key":"classification","name":"Classification/Definition","title":null},"standingState":"untested-supported","accessCount":123,"createdAt":"2026-08-10T00:24:10.571Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/bWIiwHtY/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":0,"contests":0,"buildsOn":0,"reuses":0,"supports":0,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":null}},{"argumentId":"cmsmhnqi1030rg15q9vkvhumn","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/7Mes5PjX","shortCode":"7Mes5PjX","version":1,"text":"The grounding as published is not independently verifiable: the derivation of the class probabilities appears nowhere in the paper, and the cited monograph is a 397-page non-free-access volume with no page or theorem named at this test. (Position B, this reconstruction's.)","deliberation":{"id":"cmsmhl00902sxg15qc6daetnj","title":"Which result grounds the longest-run bucket distribution?"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmsmhnpdx030lg15qoqh9faqo","moid":"e58a920f07966e3e8d2b30e842150430a42f33f8fb112fbee7d24708eba82e89","text":"The grounding as published is not independently verifiable: the derivation of the class probabilities appears nowhere in the paper, and the cited monograph is a 397-page non-free-access volume with no page or theorem named at this test. (Position B, this reconstruction's.)"},"scheme":{"key":"classification","name":"Classification/Definition","title":null},"standingState":"untested-supported","accessCount":118,"createdAt":"2026-08-10T00:23:52.297Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/7Mes5PjX/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":1,"contests":0,"buildsOn":0,"reuses":0,"supports":1,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":{"kind":"supports","shortCode":"bWIiwHtY","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/bWIiwHtY","text":"The inaccessibility is independently documented: two independent readers (the guide's author and the video) hit the same terminal — the probabilities' derivation is not reachable from the paper as published.","standingState":null}}},{"argumentId":"cmsmhncry02zpg15qs2agp6jy","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/4lvAtZi1","shortCode":"4lvAtZi1","version":1,"text":"The Révész reference is genuine and page-precise where the paper checks it: §3.13 cites \"Theorem 2.6, p. 17 of Revesz [2]\" — so [3] at the longest-run test is a real, specific source, cited loosely rather than fabricated.","deliberation":{"id":"cmsmhl00902sxg15qc6daetnj","title":"Which result grounds the longest-run bucket distribution?"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmsmhnbq502zlg15qzn4enodu","moid":"304810cf9fc14896b5336dc83c8c8f53e30c78694c7154ce8bd1874e2bec92f1","text":"The Révész reference is genuine and page-precise where the paper checks it: §3.13 cites \"Theorem 2.6, p. 17 of Revesz [2]\" — so [3] at the longest-run test is a real, specific source, cited loosely rather than fabricated."},"scheme":{"key":"classification","name":"Classification/Definition","title":null},"standingState":"untested-supported","accessCount":139,"createdAt":"2026-08-10T00:23:34.510Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/4lvAtZi1/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":0,"contests":0,"buildsOn":0,"reuses":0,"supports":0,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":null}},{"argumentId":"cmsmhmxoo02yjg15qylx45mc9","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/OElZk7m0","shortCode":"OElZk7m0","version":1,"text":"The longest-run test's class probabilities π0…πK are grounded in reference [3] — Révész (1990): the paper states they were determined from it. (Position A, the paper's, reconstructed.)","deliberation":{"id":"cmsmhl00902sxg15qc6daetnj","title":"Which result grounds the longest-run bucket distribution?"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmsmhmwme02ydg15qzxj30274","moid":"e6b05336087451a078fa7f3dc5ba51453b69877cc799524c5d783fd5ff7044da","text":"The longest-run test's class probabilities π0…πK are grounded in reference [3] — Révész (1990): the paper states they were determined from it. (Position A, the paper's, reconstructed.)"},"scheme":{"key":"classification","name":"Classification/Definition","title":null},"standingState":"untested-supported","accessCount":122,"createdAt":"2026-08-10T00:23:14.952Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/OElZk7m0/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":1,"contests":0,"buildsOn":0,"reuses":0,"supports":1,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":{"kind":"supports","shortCode":"4lvAtZi1","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/4lvAtZi1","text":"The Révész reference is genuine and page-precise where the paper checks it: §3.13 cites \"Theorem 2.6, p. 17 of Revesz [2]\" — so [3] at the longest-run test is a real, specific source, cited loosely rather than fabricated.","standingState":null}}},{"argumentId":"cmsmhm2iu02vwg15qzi34k5ru","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/HbYvJmKO","shortCode":"HbYvJmKO","version":1,"text":"The longest-run test's block sizes and class boundaries are fixed constants: K+1 classes chosen depending on M, cases K=3/M=8, K=5/M=128, K=6/M=10000 embedded in the code, and §2.4.2's table setting minimum lengths n = 128, 6272, 750000 for M = 8, 128, 10^4 (SP 800-22 rev 1a §2.4/§3.4).","deliberation":{"id":"cmsmhkyn502sug15qipk82dw4","title":"Why these block-size cutoffs and bucket boundaries?"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmsmhm12n02vog15qf0mnnq0a","moid":"120852ce6cc391c9622fb860078045c9b787477bfda9bdfffba807042b4f4ba6","text":"The longest-run test's block sizes and class boundaries are fixed constants: K+1 classes chosen depending on M, cases K=3/M=8, K=5/M=128, K=6/M=10000 embedded in the code, and §2.4.2's table setting minimum lengths n = 128, 6272, 750000 for M = 8, 128, 10^4 (SP 800-22 rev 1a §2.4/§3.4)."},"scheme":{"key":"classification","name":"Classification/Definition","title":null},"standingState":"untested-default","accessCount":121,"createdAt":"2026-08-10T00:22:34.566Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/HbYvJmKO/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":0,"contests":0,"buildsOn":0,"reuses":0,"supports":0,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":null}},{"argumentId":"cmsmhl7fa02tbg15qgsk07v2f","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/NPT13fJz","shortCode":"NPT13fJz","version":1,"text":"The block frequency test's statistic is χ²(obs) = 4M Σ(πi − 1/2)², referred to a χ² distribution with N degrees of freedom (SP 800-22 rev 1a §3.2, p. 64).","deliberation":{"id":"cmsmhkx9m02srg15qowy6yknh","title":"Why does the block chi-squared carry the 4M factor?"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmsmhl5x802t5g15qnaswoo18","moid":"a7d7edacf8d4e61084f987b3f03d6462d08aeb815abb2bba2dd6e53b13ad4b02","text":"The block frequency test's statistic is χ²(obs) = 4M Σ(πi − 1/2)², referred to a χ² distribution with N degrees of freedom (SP 800-22 rev 1a §3.2, p. 64)."},"scheme":{"key":"classification","name":"Classification/Definition","title":null},"standingState":"untested-default","accessCount":124,"createdAt":"2026-08-10T00:21:54.263Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/NPT13fJz/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":0,"contests":0,"buildsOn":0,"reuses":0,"supports":0,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":null}},{"argumentId":"cmsl4nd4i063yg1majyzz9muw","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/u9f7TtAk","shortCode":"u9f7TtAk","version":1,"text":"The productive–unproductive distinction was therefore not abandoned but reconstituted as a paid–unpaid boundary, converting a theoretical debate into a measurement debate and constraining subsequent theory and governance.","deliberation":{"id":"cmsl4gv6905j3g1maki87mxrg","title":"Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmsl4n8gk063eg1mal8gp5eon","moid":"0da18b2215eb3d881cc35b979218b7daab628550b6aae474f04b78d84b0edcf7","text":"The productive–unproductive distinction was therefore not abandoned but reconstituted as a paid–unpaid boundary, converting a theoretical debate into a measurement debate and constraining subsequent theory and governance."},"scheme":{"key":"inference_to_best_explanation","name":"Inference to the Best Explanation","title":null},"standingState":"untested-default","accessCount":137,"createdAt":"2026-08-09T01:31:53.778Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/u9f7TtAk/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":0,"contests":0,"buildsOn":0,"reuses":0,"supports":0,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":null}},{"argumentId":"cmsl4mte5062cg1magotbqlp5","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/kkVtUoKN","shortCode":"kkVtUoKN","version":1,"text":"By structuring economic analysis around what could be counted in national accounts, the accounts enforced the commodified-utilities frame and transformed productive labour into paid labour.","deliberation":{"id":"cmsl4gv6905j3g1maki87mxrg","title":"Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmsl4mor7061sg1ma6j9ax47y","moid":"45f76e8dfaf6410c2aadbff9a1a44febd976ce72d11b219f1ea8285da3a89bdc","text":"By structuring economic analysis around what could be counted in national accounts, the accounts enforced the commodified-utilities frame and transformed productive labour into paid labour."},"scheme":{"key":"cause_to_effect","name":"Causal Reasoning","title":"Cause to Effect"},"standingState":"untested-default","accessCount":140,"createdAt":"2026-08-09T01:31:28.205Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/kkVtUoKN/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":1,"contests":0,"buildsOn":1,"reuses":0,"supports":0,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":{"kind":"builds-on","shortCode":"u9f7TtAk","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/u9f7TtAk","text":"The productive–unproductive distinction was therefore not abandoned but reconstituted as a paid–unpaid boundary, converting a theoretical debate into a measurement debate and constraining subsequent theory and governance.","standingState":null}}},{"argumentId":"cmsl4m8sx060eg1mafv5j3l4r","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/6tT1EEQx","shortCode":"6tT1EEQx","version":1,"text":"National income accounts, the dominant economic statistical representation, measured primarily market transactions and thereby made nonmonetary utility exchanges, including unpaid household work, unobservable.","deliberation":{"id":"cmsl4gv6905j3g1maki87mxrg","title":"Paper reconstruction — Dustin Avent-Holt & Alysha Bailey (2024), What counts as productive? Redefining ‘producers’ in economic discourse, 1890–1960"},"conclusion":{"claimId":"cmsl4m43o05zug1mamb9lw24z","moid":"8c2f05e0e0be894d1e235211ee2bd03d8125819898f0f48d8f479cae3a198716","text":"National income accounts, the dominant economic statistical representation, measured primarily market transactions and thereby made nonmonetary utility exchanges, including unpaid household work, unobservable."},"scheme":{"key":"cause_to_effect","name":"Causal Reasoning","title":"Cause to Effect"},"standingState":"untested-default","accessCount":138,"createdAt":"2026-08-09T01:31:01.521Z","attestationUrl":"https://www.isonomia.app/api/a/6tT1EEQx/aif?format=attestation","strongestCounter":null,"citedBy":{"total":1,"contests":0,"buildsOn":1,"reuses":0,"supports":0,"externalTrusted":0,"strongest":{"kind":"builds-on","shortCode":"kkVtUoKN","permalink":"https://www.isonomia.app/a/kkVtUoKN","text":"By structuring economic analysis around what could be counted in national accounts, the accounts enforced the commodified-utilities frame and transformed productive labour into paid labour.","standingState":null}}}]}