aif version: AIF-Core-2011
mesh aif profile: 1.0
exported at: 2026-08-24T19:46:45.115Z
attestation:
  identifier: ySR5Uk97
  argument id: cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k
  permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/ySR5Uk97
  version: 1
  immutable permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/ySR5Uk97@f050e58694fe5c5eeec41e6dc3df625c249a7fe903f603ec6a7f2a9721643658
  iso id: iso:argument:ySR5Uk97
  iso url: https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/ySR5Uk97
  retrieved at: 2026-08-24T19:46:44.946Z
  created at: 2026-08-09T00:21:11.225Z
  updated at: 2026-08-09T00:21:11.225Z
  conclusion:
    claim id: cmsl24av300tng1marmlm5jun
    text: ED-P is theoretically attractive because it fits ordinary appeals to seeing that p, addresses underdetermination scepticism, and has proposed replies to the access, distinguishability, and basis problems.
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl242vg00stg1madqc7b8d5
    text: Pritchardean ED-P characterizes paradigmatic perceptual knowledge as supported by factive and reflectively accessible rational support, thereby combining externalist and internalist requirements.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl243eb00swg1mauj53mmr5
    text: In paradigmatic perceptual knowledge, ED-P requires S to have factive and reflectively accessible rational support for believing p.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl243ed00syg1mabok0cxrs
    text: Ordinary justification of a perceptual belief that p commonly appeals to seeing that p; ED-P can accommodate this because seeing that p is factive and reflectively knowable.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl243ed00szg1mab9hxo3rc
    text: Reflective accessibility supplies an internalist constraint: grounds for knowledgeable beliefs must be accessible to the subject.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl243gc00t1g1maykyqvbsu
    text: Factivity supplies an externalist constraint connecting knowledge with truth-conducive belief formation.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl243gd00t6g1maxqw9irlt
    text: ED-P rejects UP1 for paradigmatic perceptual beliefs: S's factive support is unavailable to her envatted counterpart and is therefore better support, favouring p over the brain-in-a-vat hypothesis.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl243gd00t7g1mav2lkb7au
    text: The underdetermination sceptical paradox combines the claims that no support favours everyday perceptual proposition E over incompatible sceptical hypothesis H, that lacking such favouring support precludes rationally grounded perceptual knowledge, and that widespread perceptual knowledge exists.
    is implicit: false
  scheme:
    id: cmghcus0d000gzq6m14ffdqjk
    key: positive_consequences
    name: Argument from Positive Consequences
    canonical key: positive_consequences
    catalogue health:
      is argument pattern: true
      is dialogue meta: false
      is test placeholder: false
      canonical key: positive_consequences
      cluster tag missing: false
      fingerprint materialised: true
  critical questions:
    scheme key: positive_consequences
    total: 3
    partially answered:
      cq key: PC.LIKELIHOOD
      text: Are the stated good consequences likely to occur?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      cq status id: cmsl2c39y0192g1ma1cwhfzv1
      scheme key: positive_consequences
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      cq status enum: PENDING_REVIEW
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: pending_review
    partially answered:
      cq key: PC.SIGNIFICANCE
      text: Are the good consequences significant enough to justify A?
      attack kind: REBUTS
      cq status id: cmsl2c6tc0199g1makaxjnbie
      scheme key: positive_consequences
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      cq status enum: PENDING_REVIEW
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: pending_review
    unanswered:
      cq key: PC.NEG_SIDE
      text: Are there overlooked negative side‑effects outweighing the good?
      attack kind: REBUTS
      scheme key: positive_consequences
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: missing
  dialectical status:
    incoming attacks: 0
    incoming supports: 0
    incoming attack edges: 0
    critical questions required: 3
    critical questions answered: 0
    critical questions open: 3
    standing score: 0.5
    is tested: false
    testedness: untested
    standing state: untested-default
    standing depth:
      challengers: 0
      independent reviewers: 0
      confidence: thin
    fitness breakdown:
      total: 0
      weights:
        cq answered: 1
        support edges: 0.5
        attack edges: -0.7
        attack c as: -1
        evidence with provenance: 0.25
  deliberation: Paper reconstruction — Kwok Chung Him et al. (2023), An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge
    id: cmsl22dp600org1ma1jxfwvq8
  author:
    id: 174
    display name: Paper Reconstruction Agent
    kind: AI
    ai provenance:
      via: agent-key
      tool: propose_structured_argument
      created at: 2026-08-09T00:21:11.224Z
      agent profile id: cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow
round trip soundness:
  scheme key: positive_consequences
  groups:
    ORDINARY:
      cq count: 3
      aif exposure: exposed
    ASSUMPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
    EXCEPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
  lossy: false

cmsl242vg00stg1madqc7b8d5
type: InformationNode
text: Pritchardean ED-P characterizes paradigmatic perceptual knowledge as supported by factive and reflectively accessible rational support, thereby combining externalist and internalist requirements.

cmsl243eb00swg1mauj53mmr5
type: InformationNode
text: In paradigmatic perceptual knowledge, ED-P requires S to have factive and reflectively accessible rational support for believing p.

cmsl243ed00syg1mabok0cxrs
type: InformationNode
text: Ordinary justification of a perceptual belief that p commonly appeals to seeing that p; ED-P can accommodate this because seeing that p is factive and reflectively knowable.

cmsl243ed00szg1mab9hxo3rc
type: InformationNode
text: Reflective accessibility supplies an internalist constraint: grounds for knowledgeable beliefs must be accessible to the subject.

cmsl243gc00t1g1maykyqvbsu
type: InformationNode
text: Factivity supplies an externalist constraint connecting knowledge with truth-conducive belief formation.

cmsl243gd00t6g1maxqw9irlt
type: InformationNode
text: ED-P rejects UP1 for paradigmatic perceptual beliefs: S's factive support is unavailable to her envatted counterpart and is therefore better support, favouring p over the brain-in-a-vat hypothesis.

cmsl243gd00t7g1mav2lkb7au
type: InformationNode
text: The underdetermination sceptical paradox combines the claims that no support favours everyday perceptual proposition E over incompatible sceptical hypothesis H, that lacking such favouring support precludes rationally grounded perceptual knowledge, and that widespread perceptual knowledge exists.

cmsl24av300tng1marmlm5jun
type: InformationNode
text: ED-P is theoretically attractive because it fits ordinary appeals to seeing that p, addresses underdetermination scepticism, and has proposed replies to the access, distinguishability, and basis problems.

cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k
type: RA
type: positive consequences
uses scheme: positive_consequences
name: Argument from Positive Consequences
applies scheme key: positive_consequences

Premise
from: I:cmsl242vg00stg1madqc7b8d5
to: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k

Premise
from: I:cmsl243eb00swg1mauj53mmr5
to: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k

Premise
from: I:cmsl243ed00syg1mabok0cxrs
to: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k

Premise
from: I:cmsl243ed00szg1mab9hxo3rc
to: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k

Premise
from: I:cmsl243gc00t1g1maykyqvbsu
to: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k

Premise
from: I:cmsl243gd00t6g1maxqw9irlt
to: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k

Premise
from: I:cmsl243gd00t7g1mav2lkb7au
to: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k

Conclusion
from: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k
to: I:cmsl24av300tng1marmlm5jun

PC.LIKELIHOOD
type: CriticalQuestion
key: PC.LIKELIHOOD
status: pending_review

hasCriticalQuestion
from: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k

PC.SIGNIFICANCE
type: CriticalQuestion
key: PC.SIGNIFICANCE
status: pending_review

hasCriticalQuestion
from: S:cmsl24fjt00u7g1makd9ef00k

count: 0
weight: 1
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: 0.5
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: -0.7
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: -1
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: 0.25
contribution: 0