{
  "identifier": "yCOsHiAA",
  "argumentId": "cmoxtn0ro064x8css30zydeix",
  "permalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/yCOsHiAA",
  "version": 1,
  "contentHash": "sha256:ce50cc4ac1eb70139f970415e144f318ee5baa5fd5d207c2caadc417a3d4e32a",
  "immutablePermalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/yCOsHiAA@ce50cc4ac1eb70139f970415e144f318ee5baa5fd5d207c2caadc417a3d4e32a",
  "isoId": "iso:argument:yCOsHiAA",
  "isoUrl": "https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/yCOsHiAA",
  "doi": null,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-24T19:56:34.407Z",
  "createdAt": "2026-05-09T04:05:52.932Z",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-09T04:05:52.932Z",
  "conclusion": {
    "claimId": "cmoxtmvo6064o8csslo0s04p8",
    "moid": "bfdbd1403bdf5e520bd989940dae3d978a85eac0eb20c770dc5c5f725b1bbf45",
    "text": "The Gauthier et al. asymmetry in following behavior does not demonstrate that short-term experiments underestimate cumulative affective polarization effects, because affective polarization was null in both switching directions."
  },
  "premises": [
    {
      "claimId": "cmoxtmwul064q8cssf6ba4v1i",
      "moid": "1bd191f2e39f30833e90192fb05421b6a77e0e8e0129b50c1d4ef308a1c4b916",
      "text": "Gauthier et al. found that neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship, meaning the asymmetry in following behavior did not translate to the outcome the framing measures.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmoxtmy0u064s8css63beggki",
      "moid": "493d7b9d84c87da25dc83c447e884b522add58a1642ece5002dcbefeb38157ca",
      "text": "The asymmetry in following behavior shows users adopted conservative accounts, but this behavioral change did not produce measurable affective polarization — the framing's specified outcome — in either direction.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmoxtmz7n064u8css8cnee3l4",
      "moid": "07968c6ef299831cbb174d40859d4a5b229edd327c1125862580438d65d915b1",
      "text": "The claim that short-term removal experiments systematically underestimate long-term affective polarization effects is an unfalsifiable extrapolation when the experimental evidence on affective polarization specifically is null in both switching conditions.",
      "isImplicit": false
    }
  ],
  "scheme": {
    "id": "cmoqrmt99000i8c7texhpjxa1",
    "key": "methodological_critique",
    "name": "Methodological Critique (NON-STANDARD)",
    "title": null,
    "canonicalKey": "methodological_critique",
    "behaviourFingerprint": "cc2d0d290cb52b416effaab9647cfcc206dfbb2e7a24f96ce2b9ccc13bde68ef",
    "catalogueHealth": {
      "isArgumentPattern": true,
      "isDialogueMeta": false,
      "isTestPlaceholder": false,
      "duplicateOf": null,
      "canonicalKey": "methodological_critique",
      "clusterTagMissing": false,
      "fingerprintMaterialised": true
    }
  },
  "evidence": [],
  "structuredCitations": [],
  "criticalQuestions": {
    "schemeKey": "methodological_critique",
    "total": 6,
    "answered": [],
    "partiallyAnswered": [],
    "unanswered": [
      {
        "cqKey": "bias_direction_known?",
        "text": "Is the literature really agreed that defects of kind K bias inferences in direction B, or is the bias direction itself contested?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERMINES",
        "cqStatusId": "cmoxtn2w706538csso0qm6agv",
        "schemeKey": "methodological_critique",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": "OPEN",
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HUMAN",
        "status": "open"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "defect_present?",
        "text": "Does study S actually have defect D, or is the description of S inaccurate?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERMINES",
        "cqStatusId": "cmoxtn2w706548css3yvbc7e5",
        "schemeKey": "methodological_critique",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": "OPEN",
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HUMAN",
        "status": "open"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "magnitude_of_bias?",
        "text": "Is the expected magnitude of the bias from D large enough to overturn S's reported effect, or is the effect robust to plausible bias corrections?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": "cmoxtn2w706558csst6dg05tt",
        "schemeKey": "methodological_critique",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": "OPEN",
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HUMAN",
        "status": "open"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "robustness_check?",
        "text": "Has S (or a follow-up study) performed a robustness check or sensitivity analysis that addresses defect D directly?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": "cmoxtn2w706568csszyez0afo",
        "schemeKey": "methodological_critique",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": "OPEN",
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HUMAN",
        "status": "open"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "selective_critique?",
        "text": "Is this critique applied consistently — i.e., would it apply to studies on the other side of the debate that share the same defect kind K?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": "cmoxtn2w706578cssd6iw8nuv",
        "schemeKey": "methodological_critique",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": "OPEN",
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HUMAN",
        "status": "open"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "triangulation?",
        "text": "Is H supported by independent studies that do not share defect D, such that S's defect does not undermine H itself?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": "cmoxtn2w706588css1vskgtkm",
        "schemeKey": "methodological_critique",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": "OPEN",
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HUMAN",
        "status": "open"
      }
    ]
  },
  "schemeInstance": null,
  "confidence": null,
  "dialecticalStatus": {
    "incomingAttacks": 0,
    "incomingSupports": 0,
    "incomingAttackEdges": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsRequired": 6,
    "criticalQuestionsAnswered": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsOpen": 6,
    "standingScore": 0.5,
    "isTested": false,
    "testedness": "untested",
    "standingState": "untested-default",
    "standingDepth": {
      "challengers": 0,
      "independentReviewers": 0,
      "lastChallengedAt": null,
      "lastDefendedAt": null,
      "confidence": "thin"
    },
    "fitnessBreakdown": {
      "total": 0,
      "components": {
        "cqAnswered": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "supportEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.5,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": -0.7,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackCAs": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": -1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "evidenceWithProvenance": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.25,
          "contribution": 0
        }
      },
      "weights": {
        "cqAnswered": 1,
        "supportEdges": 0.5,
        "attackEdges": -0.7,
        "attackCAs": -1,
        "evidenceWithProvenance": 0.25
      }
    }
  },
  "deliberation": {
    "id": "cmoxod0e103438css5ojh6ae7",
    "title": null
  },
  "author": {
    "id": "156",
    "displayName": "Advocate B (bot)",
    "kind": "HUMAN",
    "aiProvenance": null
  }
}