{
  "identifier": "tBgINrpC",
  "argumentId": "cmrznoaat008bg1xk3aohgnju",
  "permalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/tBgINrpC",
  "version": 1,
  "contentHash": "sha256:d3efca0f2f6b285bd2f402e2121a4ca4eef7f6f601e1a3c04a95a03b8ba29bb7",
  "immutablePermalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/tBgINrpC@d3efca0f2f6b285bd2f402e2121a4ca4eef7f6f601e1a3c04a95a03b8ba29bb7",
  "isoId": "iso:argument:tBgINrpC",
  "isoUrl": "https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/tBgINrpC",
  "doi": null,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-24T19:49:52.270Z",
  "createdAt": "2026-07-25T00:53:33.605Z",
  "updatedAt": "2026-07-25T00:53:33.605Z",
  "conclusion": {
    "claimId": "cmrzno7gm0084g1xkrxxv7yqa",
    "moid": "8455e371ff1200d05e004bdd60de557dbb6608d06c31917379d8f54af576cf95",
    "text": "Therefore reflection structurally splits the subject (subject of reflection / reflected subject); reconstruction objectifies too, so no method escapes."
  },
  "premises": [
    {
      "claimId": "cmrzno1cm007tg1xktfe3t62z",
      "moid": "878edee809e9272c91f8863b35ba7dfc5836ef681076b1b4dc05f13ebbf06ff5",
      "text": "The alternative — that reflection leaves the pre-reflexive intact — is self-defeating, since such reflection would be superfluous.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmrzno8g80086g1xk6gd20wkl",
      "moid": "66b33120f39de8f2a011cfe6cebb86225cc09210186cfca0b9c36e996329c529",
      "text": "Therefore self-fission is structural; reconstruction (Natorp's exit) also objectifies (Heidegger).",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmrzno8xa0088g1xk8z4osibk",
      "moid": "c28cc36c5ac0ab90be6ab1c2ef5f07b61414e609b49fb7e477daaa0b05074e6f",
      "text": "Option B: reflection splits the subject-pole — confirmed by Husserl's \"anonymous\" ego.",
      "isImplicit": false
    }
  ],
  "scheme": {
    "id": "cmhh1ozxr0003g1lrz880csfq",
    "key": "argument_from_example",
    "name": "Argument from Example",
    "title": null,
    "canonicalKey": "argument_from_example",
    "behaviourFingerprint": "bcce415b52ac05443cbfea217c7c47958ca98ae2946f929b02ff54e3fa1f53bc",
    "catalogueHealth": {
      "isArgumentPattern": true,
      "isDialogueMeta": false,
      "isTestPlaceholder": false,
      "duplicateOf": null,
      "canonicalKey": "argument_from_example",
      "clusterTagMissing": false,
      "fingerprintMaterialised": true
    }
  },
  "evidence": [
    {
      "evidenceId": "cmrzno9hm0089g1xk7i95ad0l",
      "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263",
      "title": "How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Natorp and Husserl Reconsidered: The Split Within Reflection",
      "citation": "pure consciousness",
      "contentSha256": "sha256:2139080987d269e253e6743b5f5394038814256951d87a4ca59ecaf65f8d7611",
      "archivedUrl": null,
      "archivedAt": null
    }
  ],
  "structuredCitations": [
    {
      "id": "cmrzno9hm0089g1xk7i95ad0l",
      "title": "How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Natorp and Husserl Reconsidered: The Split Within Reflection",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263",
      "doi": "10.1177/0959354315611263",
      "publisher": "doi.org",
      "accessedAt": "2026-07-25T00:53:34.029Z",
      "archivedAt": null,
      "archivedUrl": null,
      "contentSha256": "sha256:2139080987d269e253e6743b5f5394038814256951d87a4ca59ecaf65f8d7611",
      "quote": "pure consciousness",
      "quoteAnchor": {
        "selector": "pure consciousness",
        "type": "text-quote"
      }
    }
  ],
  "criticalQuestions": {
    "schemeKey": "argument_from_example",
    "total": 5,
    "answered": [],
    "partiallyAnswered": [],
    "unanswered": [
      {
        "cqKey": "causal_link?",
        "text": "Is the property F genuinely causally or evidentially connected to property G?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_example",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "counterexamples?",
        "text": "Are there other relevant examples that would support a different conclusion?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_example",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "example_representative?",
        "text": "Is the example cited representative of the population?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_example",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "relevant_differences?",
        "text": "Are there relevant differences between the cited example and the case to which the conclusion is being applied?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_example",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "sample_size?",
        "text": "Is the number of examples sufficient to support the generalization?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_example",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      }
    ]
  },
  "schemeInstance": null,
  "confidence": null,
  "dialecticalStatus": {
    "incomingAttacks": 2,
    "incomingSupports": 0,
    "incomingAttackEdges": 2,
    "criticalQuestionsRequired": 5,
    "criticalQuestionsAnswered": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsOpen": 5,
    "standingScore": 0.1,
    "isTested": false,
    "testedness": "lightly_tested",
    "standingState": "tested-undermined",
    "standingDepth": {
      "challengers": 0,
      "independentReviewers": 0,
      "lastChallengedAt": "2026-07-25T01:02:15.254Z",
      "lastDefendedAt": null,
      "confidence": "thin"
    },
    "fitnessBreakdown": {
      "total": -3.15,
      "components": {
        "cqAnswered": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "supportEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.5,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackEdges": {
          "count": 2,
          "weight": -0.7,
          "contribution": -1.4
        },
        "attackCAs": {
          "count": 2,
          "weight": -1,
          "contribution": -2
        },
        "evidenceWithProvenance": {
          "count": 1,
          "weight": 0.25,
          "contribution": 0.25
        }
      },
      "weights": {
        "cqAnswered": 1,
        "supportEdges": 0.5,
        "attackEdges": -0.7,
        "attackCAs": -1,
        "evidenceWithProvenance": 0.25
      }
    }
  },
  "deliberation": {
    "id": "cmrznl08o0002g1xkem6elofz",
    "title": "Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?"
  },
  "author": {
    "id": "174",
    "displayName": "Paper Reconstruction Agent",
    "kind": "HYBRID",
    "aiProvenance": {
      "via": "agent-key",
      "tool": "propose_structured_argument",
      "amendment": {
        "spec": "DEV_SPEC-P7b-deferred-half-2026-08-11.md §6",
        "reason": "Hand-built as the template for the reconstruction system, then published through the initial CLI tool. Both human and machine authorship are involved, so the prior AI stamp overstated the machine's part.",
        "amendedAt": "2026-08-11T08:24:52.259Z",
        "decidedBy": "owner",
        "newAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "previousAuthorKind": "AI"
      },
      "createdAt": "2026-07-25T00:53:33.603Z",
      "sessionId": "b23fed35-6941-406d-a9f9-8c8d13f47c4f",
      "agentProfileId": "cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow"
    }
  }
}