{
  "identifier": "rey6GaCa",
  "argumentId": "cmsl26cv6010vg1mar5dn97a4",
  "permalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/rey6GaCa",
  "version": 1,
  "contentHash": "sha256:2cb1ca94bdac641aad05a8428a2bf77c9a1a6d8bed6dbbb434355a4f29389f78",
  "immutablePermalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/rey6GaCa@2cb1ca94bdac641aad05a8428a2bf77c9a1a6d8bed6dbbb434355a4f29389f78",
  "isoId": "iso:argument:rey6GaCa",
  "isoUrl": "https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/rey6GaCa",
  "doi": null,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-24T19:49:10.434Z",
  "createdAt": "2026-08-09T00:22:41.059Z",
  "updatedAt": "2026-08-09T00:22:41.059Z",
  "conclusion": {
    "claimId": "cmsl268a5010bg1makvoyq7iw",
    "moid": "41ef69a073519191643cf68adc9334a2891f958f7ca890499866a3c0db847712",
    "text": "Therefore, conditional on ED-P's success, a unified ED-M of paradigmatic memory knowledge is defensible against the principal objections and retains ED-P's theoretical advantages."
  },
  "premises": [
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl260hi00zkg1maf7y6qs1c",
      "moid": "72f60a20e0df221765c17d26711f23937c9661d948591401cb1aa5efedaf76a2",
      "text": "Radford-like cases lacking reflective access are nonparadigmatic, so ED-M is neutral on whether they constitute memory knowledge and they do not refute the account.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl26916010ig1maumsgip4e",
      "moid": "715619e18991289d906dcda90be4fc28acf0816d963c55b36ed9b26e93d621a5",
      "text": "The paper has shown that ED-M is preferable in each of those three respects.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl26917010jg1ma0qcq7wru",
      "moid": "1726f654fa2b28cdd5cc2add731835d5f48d3e43f26c93c53ceb14023d0597cd",
      "text": "Pritchard's ED-P has three theoretical advantages: it accommodates internalist and externalist intuitions, fits ordinary belief-justification practices, and addresses underdetermination-based radical scepticism.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl26917010kg1ma8uzvlawk",
      "moid": "e277e88e1a988cc04173b0ec83551c2907e4e1e167c61dd4c0b2a308814da537",
      "text": "The sleeping-memory objection imposes an unnecessary requirement that ED-M can reject: that acquiring memory knowledge requires access to a particular memorial experience.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl26917010lg1mamvaa7jwe",
      "moid": "b8327fb4beafd5002b115fedcb0f6ffdff561f0fbf4b29eae7f6dacd896e000f",
      "text": "Milburn and Moon object that memory knowledge can occur without access to the experience related to the remembered proposition, particularly during sleep.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl26917010mg1mabtxb5t9j",
      "moid": "f82e3e15529c1348d6c015c22e5a3e5ff2815524c812430051c6f65866ccf90a",
      "text": "The authors' response is that this objection targets access internalism generally, rather than ED-MS or ED-M specifically.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl26917010ng1masbc5kpsf",
      "moid": "1cb264960210988fc836f2001de90b344c82bf86b90eb98ab1ff4f772ec3a7b7",
      "text": "ED-M can use ED-P's defensive responses to the access, distinguishability, and basis problems.",
      "isImplicit": false
    }
  ],
  "scheme": {
    "id": "cmghcus0d000gzq6m14ffdqjk",
    "key": "positive_consequences",
    "name": "Argument from Positive Consequences",
    "title": null,
    "canonicalKey": "positive_consequences",
    "behaviourFingerprint": "8381e6bea00235644f93c8b8996de190a0859316ab36b8654b0eb992c53d7941",
    "catalogueHealth": {
      "isArgumentPattern": true,
      "isDialogueMeta": false,
      "isTestPlaceholder": false,
      "duplicateOf": null,
      "canonicalKey": "positive_consequences",
      "clusterTagMissing": false,
      "fingerprintMaterialised": true
    }
  },
  "evidence": [],
  "structuredCitations": [],
  "criticalQuestions": {
    "schemeKey": "positive_consequences",
    "total": 3,
    "answered": [],
    "partiallyAnswered": [],
    "unanswered": [
      {
        "cqKey": "PC.LIKELIHOOD",
        "text": "Are the stated good consequences likely to occur?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "positive_consequences",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "PC.NEG_SIDE",
        "text": "Are there overlooked negative side‑effects outweighing the good?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "positive_consequences",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "PC.SIGNIFICANCE",
        "text": "Are the good consequences significant enough to justify A?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "positive_consequences",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      }
    ]
  },
  "schemeInstance": null,
  "confidence": null,
  "dialecticalStatus": {
    "incomingAttacks": 0,
    "incomingSupports": 0,
    "incomingAttackEdges": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsRequired": 3,
    "criticalQuestionsAnswered": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsOpen": 3,
    "standingScore": 0.5,
    "isTested": false,
    "testedness": "untested",
    "standingState": "untested-default",
    "standingDepth": {
      "challengers": 0,
      "independentReviewers": 0,
      "lastChallengedAt": null,
      "lastDefendedAt": null,
      "confidence": "thin"
    },
    "fitnessBreakdown": {
      "total": 0,
      "components": {
        "cqAnswered": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "supportEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.5,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": -0.7,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackCAs": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": -1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "evidenceWithProvenance": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.25,
          "contribution": 0
        }
      },
      "weights": {
        "cqAnswered": 1,
        "supportEdges": 0.5,
        "attackEdges": -0.7,
        "attackCAs": -1,
        "evidenceWithProvenance": 0.25
      }
    }
  },
  "deliberation": {
    "id": "cmsl22dp600org1ma1jxfwvq8",
    "title": "Paper reconstruction — Kwok Chung Him et al. (2023), An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge"
  },
  "author": {
    "id": "174",
    "displayName": "Paper Reconstruction Agent",
    "kind": "AI",
    "aiProvenance": {
      "via": "agent-key",
      "tool": "propose_structured_argument",
      "createdAt": "2026-08-09T00:22:41.057Z",
      "sessionId": "0d60391a-c7fd-4184-b362-cca36d2e6d20",
      "agentProfileId": "cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow"
    }
  }
}