{
  "identifier": "oTObaC1Z",
  "argumentId": "cmrznp38z00acg1xk555ecqw0",
  "permalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/oTObaC1Z",
  "version": 1,
  "contentHash": "sha256:2ff7ad8b26f10190b2c12d1f6c08359c6d4ac5db180123ec447cf4674d337c1e",
  "immutablePermalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/oTObaC1Z@2ff7ad8b26f10190b2c12d1f6c08359c6d4ac5db180123ec447cf4674d337c1e",
  "isoId": "iso:argument:oTObaC1Z",
  "isoUrl": "https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/oTObaC1Z",
  "doi": null,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-24T19:48:52.499Z",
  "createdAt": "2026-07-25T00:54:11.123Z",
  "updatedAt": "2026-07-25T00:54:11.123Z",
  "conclusion": {
    "claimId": "cmrznp1v500a6g1xk1g7i8nx0",
    "moid": "f5db0f49fb29b1f7c4b89a1a37df5b98d04c8842954e255211ba2d4544c8c9c1",
    "text": "Reflection leaves the pre-reflexive Ego intact: it is a consummation or disclosing intensification of what is already lived, not a falsifying mirror, so no structural split follows from reflective self-givenness."
  },
  "premises": [
    {
      "claimId": "cmrznp2i300a9g1xkp6asv7xz",
      "moid": "718ba242703b2e49b7a3ee152cee647893d567a478462a24a3ae7e0cb2c57939",
      "text": "Hierarchies of reflection (pure/impure, radical/less radical, theoretical/hermeneutical) allow a mode of reflection that reaches the pre-reflexive without distorting it.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmrznp2i300aag1xk7lklczcj",
      "moid": "cc8367aa96bbd8393f603d485aba53b10b6de11e864ca0af1fc39f0695140c64",
      "text": "Reflection can be conceived as consummation or disclosing intensification of pre-reflective life rather than as a falsifying mirror.",
      "isImplicit": false
    }
  ],
  "scheme": {
    "id": "cmhh1p0iw0006g1lrwo90b7kr",
    "key": "verbal_classification",
    "name": "Argument from Verbal Classification",
    "title": null,
    "canonicalKey": "verbal_classification",
    "behaviourFingerprint": "b88775978f70a08d9d57747bcbd3c309f1a0860c91a49ed8c865ee43c8b7a50f",
    "catalogueHealth": {
      "isArgumentPattern": true,
      "isDialogueMeta": false,
      "isTestPlaceholder": false,
      "duplicateOf": null,
      "canonicalKey": "verbal_classification",
      "clusterTagMissing": false,
      "fingerprintMaterialised": true
    }
  },
  "evidence": [],
  "structuredCitations": [],
  "criticalQuestions": {
    "schemeKey": "verbal_classification",
    "total": 5,
    "answered": [],
    "partiallyAnswered": [],
    "unanswered": [
      {
        "cqKey": "alternative_classifications?",
        "text": "Are there alternative classifications that might apply?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "verbal_classification",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "boundary_clear?",
        "text": "Is the boundary of the classification category clear?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "verbal_classification",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "classification_acceptable?",
        "text": "Is the verbal classification in the major premise acceptable?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "verbal_classification",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "exceptional_circumstances?",
        "text": "Are there exceptional circumstances in this case that would prevent the classification from holding?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "verbal_classification",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "has_property?",
        "text": "Does a definitely have property F, or is there room for doubt?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERMINES",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "verbal_classification",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      }
    ]
  },
  "schemeInstance": null,
  "confidence": null,
  "dialecticalStatus": {
    "incomingAttacks": 1,
    "incomingSupports": 0,
    "incomingAttackEdges": 1,
    "criticalQuestionsRequired": 5,
    "criticalQuestionsAnswered": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsOpen": 5,
    "standingScore": 0.167,
    "isTested": false,
    "testedness": "lightly_tested",
    "standingState": "tested-undermined",
    "standingDepth": {
      "challengers": 0,
      "independentReviewers": 0,
      "lastChallengedAt": "2026-07-25T01:01:49.404Z",
      "lastDefendedAt": null,
      "confidence": "thin"
    },
    "fitnessBreakdown": {
      "total": -1.7,
      "components": {
        "cqAnswered": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "supportEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.5,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackEdges": {
          "count": 1,
          "weight": -0.7,
          "contribution": -0.7
        },
        "attackCAs": {
          "count": 1,
          "weight": -1,
          "contribution": -1
        },
        "evidenceWithProvenance": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.25,
          "contribution": 0
        }
      },
      "weights": {
        "cqAnswered": 1,
        "supportEdges": 0.5,
        "attackEdges": -0.7,
        "attackCAs": -1,
        "evidenceWithProvenance": 0.25
      }
    }
  },
  "deliberation": {
    "id": "cmrznl08o0002g1xkem6elofz",
    "title": "Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?"
  },
  "author": {
    "id": "174",
    "displayName": "Paper Reconstruction Agent",
    "kind": "HYBRID",
    "aiProvenance": {
      "via": "agent-key",
      "tool": "propose_structured_argument",
      "amendment": {
        "spec": "DEV_SPEC-P7b-deferred-half-2026-08-11.md §6",
        "reason": "Hand-built as the template for the reconstruction system, then published through the initial CLI tool. Both human and machine authorship are involved, so the prior AI stamp overstated the machine's part.",
        "amendedAt": "2026-08-11T08:24:54.039Z",
        "decidedBy": "owner",
        "newAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "previousAuthorKind": "AI"
      },
      "createdAt": "2026-07-25T00:54:11.122Z",
      "sessionId": "b23fed35-6941-406d-a9f9-8c8d13f47c4f",
      "agentProfileId": "cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow"
    }
  }
}