Carbon tax revenue could fund a $2,000/year dividend to offset household costs.
A $50/ton tax would generate approximately $300 billion annually.
Distributing revenue equally would give each household ~$2,000/year.
Canada's carbon dividend program shows this is administratively feasible.
Is there a better alternative than A to achieve G?
Is A feasible for the agent (ability, resources, time)?
Is the goal/value G explicit and acceptable?
Will doing A actually achieve G in the present context?
Is doing A permissible/appropriate given norms or constraints?
Do negative consequences of A outweigh achieving G?