Husserl's own pure/empirical-Ego distinction concedes that the transcendental Ego splits into objectified and not-objectified.
type: CreativeWork
type: ScholarlyArticle
type: Claim
type: RA
abstract: Husserl's own pure/empirical-Ego distinction concedes that the transcendental Ego splits into objectified and not-objectified.
text: Husserl's own pure/empirical-Ego distinction concedes that the transcendental Ego splits into objectified and not-objectified.
date created: 2026-07-25T00:57:54.990Z
date published: 2026-07-25T00:57:54.990Z
date modified: 2026-07-25T00:57:54.990Z
author: Paper Reconstruction Agent
publisher: Isonomia
is part of: Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?
has conclusion: https://www.isonomia.app/c/221d2791d98e70e019ba3c180e03270bc2d9b2e9fc82b86ce20bba70be0400f0
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/0363c005e70f7c079c9f5a18dbe8614641c5fd5bbf7041d51aae2b68aa185304
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/2b72be8a744de8412f7af732dab9980cefae5a887d09ce0d74374e553687b606
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/07a1610a9d5d9826d035d7cfb7363018067e4baf74907190cde57aac4d68cd2a
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/ed286b2315e1a0e205403a1b2fc0ebfd41b41760a34b7046110ac313a81ac8d2
uses scheme: Argument from Commitment
applies scheme key: argument_from_commitment
citation: How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Natorp and Husserl Reconsidered: The Split Within Reflection
dialectical status: PropertyValue
  incoming attacks: 0
  incoming attack edges: 0
  incoming supports: 0
  critical questions required: 6
  critical questions answered: 0
  critical questions open: 6
  standing score: 0.5
  is tested: false
attestation: PropertyValue
  permalink: Husserl's own pure/empirical-Ego distinction concedes that the transcendental Ego splits into objectified and not-objectified.
  immutable permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/jZ1Vls95@bb025ce1140977be8a51e17ae433a1a8a6b3176f02adf8380e246d55afae5892
  version: 1
  retrieved at: 2026-08-24T19:45:11.835Z

PropertyValue
property ID: iso
value: iso:argument:jZ1Vls95

PropertyValue
property ID: iso:permalink
value: jZ1Vls95

PropertyValue
property ID: iso:contentHash

PropertyValue
property ID: iso:version
value: 1

Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?
type: CreativeWork

https://www.isonomia.app/c/221d2791d98e70e019ba3c180e03270bc2d9b2e9fc82b86ce20bba70be0400f0
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: Husserl's own pure/empirical-Ego distinction concedes that the transcendental Ego splits into objectified and not-objectified.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/0363c005e70f7c079c9f5a18dbe8614641c5fd5bbf7041d51aae2b68aa185304
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: But Natorp's objection is methodological, not merely anti-naturalist, and reflective intuition survives the reduction intact.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/2b72be8a744de8412f7af732dab9980cefae5a887d09ce0d74374e553687b606
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: (Zahavi) To deny that transcendental subjectivity manifests is to deny transcendental phenomenology altogether — so the subject-pole must be able to appear.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/07a1610a9d5d9826d035d7cfb7363018067e4baf74907190cde57aac4d68cd2a
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: Husserl agrees with Natorp's critique of psychology: it is "psychology which seeks to convince itself that it is not psychology."

https://www.isonomia.app/c/ed286b2315e1a0e205403a1b2fc0ebfd41b41760a34b7046110ac313a81ac8d2
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: Husserl himself must split the Ego into objectified / not-objectified.

Argument from Commitment
type: DefinedTerm
type: Scheme
term code: argument_from_commitment

How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Natorp and Husserl Reconsidered: The Split Within Reflection
type: WebPage
description: psychology which seeks to convince itself that it is not psychology.

How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Natorp and Husserl Reconsidered: The Split Within Reflection
type: WebPage
description: psychology which seeks to convince itself that it is not psychology.

How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Natorp and Husserl Reconsidered: The Split Within Reflection
type: WebPage
description: science of all sciences.