aif version: AIF-Core-2011
mesh aif profile: 1.0
exported at: 2026-08-24T19:46:44.323Z
attestation:
  identifier: gH1xacSF
  argument id: cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul
  permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/gH1xacSF
  version: 1
  immutable permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/gH1xacSF@6c8d6d18dd4238f6b7b6d076e54e3206391c675f4a649ad0799282e35087ab9e
  iso id: iso:argument:gH1xacSF
  iso url: https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/gH1xacSF
  retrieved at: 2026-08-24T19:46:44.210Z
  created at: 2026-08-09T00:02:31.087Z
  updated at: 2026-08-09T00:02:31.087Z
  conclusion:
    claim id: cmsl1gamc003xg1maksxioxs3
    text: Trotzke’s German evidence tests only wh- and dass-exclamatives containing explicitly scale-indicating elements.
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1g2l20036g1ma88c3qzgo
    text: TaG’s case centrally depends on challenging the claims that exclamatives’ descriptive content is not deniable and that exclamatives cannot answer information-seeking questions.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gbdl0042g1maaf013trw
    text: Second-group exclamatives only seem deniable because their explicitly scale-indicating elements, such as groß and schnell, can be rejected.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gbdm0043g1maserq432m
    text: German exclamatives divide into three types that differ in deniability: declarative exclamatives, exclamatives with an explicitly gradable element, and exclamatives without such an element.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gbdm0044g1maxtu26vbc
    text: Removing the scale-indicating element from second-group exclamatives makes them no longer deniable and makes them behave like third-group exclamatives.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gbdm0045g1marnzqcn0z
    text: Declarative exclamatives, the first group, can be denied through either strong or weak denial.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gbfn0048g1ma2g4k22h5
    text: Neither Trotzke's 2019 study nor TaG discusses German third-group examples.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gbfn0049g1maokwwiuae
    text: Third-group exclamatives, including those without an explicitly gradable element, cannot be denied by either strong or weak denial.
    is implicit: false
  scheme:
    id: cmghcuvdn0010zq6mv0ywojs4
    key: classification
    name: Classification/Definition
    canonical key: classification
    catalogue health:
      is argument pattern: true
      is dialogue meta: false
      is test placeholder: false
      canonical key: classification
      cluster tag missing: false
      fingerprint materialised: true
  critical questions:
    scheme key: classification
    total: 1
    partially answered:
      cq key: category_fit
      text: Does the case fit the category?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      cq status id: cmsl1x6yt00mbg1malyfyej7p
      scheme key: classification
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      cq status enum: PENDING_REVIEW
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: pending_review
  dialectical status:
    incoming attacks: 0
    incoming supports: 0
    incoming attack edges: 0
    critical questions required: 1
    critical questions answered: 0
    critical questions open: 1
    standing score: 0.5
    is tested: false
    testedness: untested
    standing state: untested-default
    standing depth:
      challengers: 0
      independent reviewers: 0
      confidence: thin
    fitness breakdown:
      total: 0
      weights:
        cq answered: 1
        support edges: 0.5
        attack edges: -0.7
        attack c as: -1
        evidence with provenance: 0.25
  deliberation: Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood
    id: cmsl1f32d0003g1ma4bqug4gi
  author:
    id: 174
    display name: Paper Reconstruction Agent
    kind: AI
    ai provenance:
      via: agent-key
      tool: propose_structured_argument
      created at: 2026-08-09T00:02:31.086Z
      agent profile id: cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow
round trip soundness:
  scheme key: classification
  groups:
    ORDINARY:
      cq count: 1
      aif exposure: exposed
    ASSUMPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
    EXCEPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
  lossy: false

cmsl1g2l20036g1ma88c3qzgo
type: InformationNode
text: TaG’s case centrally depends on challenging the claims that exclamatives’ descriptive content is not deniable and that exclamatives cannot answer information-seeking questions.

cmsl1gamc003xg1maksxioxs3
type: InformationNode
text: Trotzke’s German evidence tests only wh- and dass-exclamatives containing explicitly scale-indicating elements.

cmsl1gbdl0042g1maaf013trw
type: InformationNode
text: Second-group exclamatives only seem deniable because their explicitly scale-indicating elements, such as groß and schnell, can be rejected.

cmsl1gbdm0043g1maserq432m
type: InformationNode
text: German exclamatives divide into three types that differ in deniability: declarative exclamatives, exclamatives with an explicitly gradable element, and exclamatives without such an element.

cmsl1gbdm0044g1maxtu26vbc
type: InformationNode
text: Removing the scale-indicating element from second-group exclamatives makes them no longer deniable and makes them behave like third-group exclamatives.

cmsl1gbdm0045g1marnzqcn0z
type: InformationNode
text: Declarative exclamatives, the first group, can be denied through either strong or weak denial.

cmsl1gbfn0048g1ma2g4k22h5
type: InformationNode
text: Neither Trotzke's 2019 study nor TaG discusses German third-group examples.

cmsl1gbfn0049g1maokwwiuae
type: InformationNode
text: Third-group exclamatives, including those without an explicitly gradable element, cannot be denied by either strong or weak denial.

cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul
type: RA
type: classification
uses scheme: classification
name: Classification/Definition
applies scheme key: classification

Premise
from: I:cmsl1g2l20036g1ma88c3qzgo
to: S:cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gbdl0042g1maaf013trw
to: S:cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gbdm0043g1maserq432m
to: S:cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gbdm0044g1maxtu26vbc
to: S:cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gbdm0045g1marnzqcn0z
to: S:cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gbfn0048g1ma2g4k22h5
to: S:cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gbfn0049g1maokwwiuae
to: S:cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul

Conclusion
from: S:cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul
to: I:cmsl1gamc003xg1maksxioxs3

category fit
type: CriticalQuestion
key: category_fit
status: pending_review

hasCriticalQuestion
from: S:cmsl1gf8v004hg1marptcb5ul

count: 0
weight: 1
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: 0.5
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: -0.7
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: -1
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: 0.25
contribution: 0