ED-M can reject the first premise of the memory underdetermination paradox because factive memory support is unavailable to the subject's fi
type: CreativeWork
type: ScholarlyArticle
type: Claim
type: RA
abstract: ED-M can reject the first premise of the memory underdetermination paradox because factive memory support is unavailable to the subject's five-minutes-world counterpart and favours p over that hypothesis.
text: ED-M can reject the first premise of the memory underdetermination paradox because factive memory support is unavailable to the subject's five-minutes-world counterpart and favours p over that hypothesis.
date created: 2026-08-09T00:22:01.039Z
date published: 2026-08-09T00:22:01.039Z
date modified: 2026-08-09T00:22:01.039Z
author: Paper Reconstruction Agent
publisher: Isonomia
is part of: Paper reconstruction — Kwok Chung Him et al. (2023), An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge
has conclusion: https://www.isonomia.app/c/de9ffe19c862014eeefbe3f5f6d8cee9266c1c394a414352f617e5b227de9184
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/7bdf3263b58d60505ca745745163363d276303a48d1e2100b74411568179e7c8
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/53e8ade5c4c56b2dd6a174cc4fe74936e450dfb80392181b477136e029942d57
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/c561c3d221a260170c83017f716ec7f6248fcf8377adbabe0fe46f522d5724ac
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/81d72b7413383e2788db6b8180754cee7e8771aa5ff74b453821c951c39e98e4
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/d9b6e2c9956f732bed7b9cc0dd904386981666ebdb5229dd06c0ebc58b627f05
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/d24ec3393fa97f322c9ec88f5d92619dda8dd8d196e4ff76b30bd38366f78983
has premise: https://www.isonomia.app/c/7321dfe1aac58f480d54549d6634b1a069cb3799ce8df51f9edfde837022e24f
uses scheme: Analogy
applies scheme key: analogy
dialectical status: PropertyValue
  incoming attacks: 0
  incoming attack edges: 0
  incoming supports: 0
  critical questions required: 2
  critical questions answered: 0
  critical questions open: 2
  standing score: 0.5
  is tested: false
attestation: PropertyValue
  permalink: ED-M can reject the first premise of the memory underdetermination paradox because factive memory support is unavailable to the subject's fi
  immutable permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/emVJAD96@37b6883f337e5b427647f0ea589bbfe0a07b70affaab25d663783790505a0072
  version: 1
  retrieved at: 2026-08-24T19:45:10.288Z

PropertyValue
property ID: iso
value: iso:argument:emVJAD96

PropertyValue
property ID: iso:permalink
value: emVJAD96

PropertyValue
property ID: iso:contentHash

PropertyValue
property ID: iso:version
value: 1

Paper reconstruction — Kwok Chung Him et al. (2023), An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge
type: CreativeWork

https://www.isonomia.app/c/de9ffe19c862014eeefbe3f5f6d8cee9266c1c394a414352f617e5b227de9184
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: ED-M can reject the first premise of the memory underdetermination paradox because factive memory support is unavailable to the subject's five-minutes-world counterpart and favours p over that hypothesis.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/7bdf3263b58d60505ca745745163363d276303a48d1e2100b74411568179e7c8
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: So formulated, ED-M inherits ED-P's reconciliation of internalist and externalist intuitions and its explanation of ordinary justification by appeal to remembering that p.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/53e8ade5c4c56b2dd6a174cc4fe74936e450dfb80392181b477136e029942d57
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: ED-M says that, in paradigmatic memory-knowledge cases, memory knowledge is grounded in rational support that is both factive and reflectively accessible.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/c561c3d221a260170c83017f716ec7f6248fcf8377adbabe0fe46f522d5724ac
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: ED-M illuminates the ordinary practice of justifying a memory belief that p by appealing to remembering that p: remembering is factive, and in paradigmatic experiential cases subjects can know by reflection that they remember.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/81d72b7413383e2788db6b8180754cee7e8771aa5ff74b453821c951c39e98e4
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: ED-P blocks its basis problem by rejecting the claim that seeing that p entails knowing that p; analogously, ED-M can block its basis problem if it rejects RK.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/d9b6e2c9956f732bed7b9cc0dd904386981666ebdb5229dd06c0ebc58b627f05
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: Like ED-P, ED-M combines an internalist element (reflective accessibility) with an externalist element (factivity), and thus satisfies both kinds of intuition.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/d24ec3393fa97f322c9ec88f5d92619dda8dd8d196e4ff76b30bd38366f78983
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: ED-M can reject the first premise of the memory underdetermination sceptical paradox because a subject's factive memory support is unavailable to her counterpart in the five-minutes world and favors p over that hypothesis.

https://www.isonomia.app/c/7321dfe1aac58f480d54549d6634b1a069cb3799ce8df51f9edfde837022e24f
type: Claim
type: InformationNode
text: The access and distinguishability problems arise from disjunctivism's general commitment to factive, reflectively accessible support for contingent beliefs, rather than from its concern with any particular kind of knowledge.

Analogy
type: DefinedTerm
type: Scheme
term code: analogy