aif version: AIF-Core-2011
mesh aif profile: 1.0
exported at: 2026-08-24T19:48:50.657Z
attestation:
  identifier: d2TLFEqz
  argument id: cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26
  permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/d2TLFEqz
  version: 1
  immutable permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/d2TLFEqz@40c358f234b7cd1bcb2594f9243c5bdddc8ece398e2d340f0e22e7af8b5245ac
  iso id: iso:argument:d2TLFEqz
  iso url: https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/d2TLFEqz
  retrieved at: 2026-08-24T19:48:50.489Z
  created at: 2026-08-09T00:22:21.255Z
  updated at: 2026-08-09T00:22:21.255Z
  conclusion:
    claim id: cmsl25skx00ytg1mareoz3p6l
    text: Stored-memory cases do not defeat ED-M when the subject can reflectively access the fact that he remembers, even without access to a particular memorial experience.
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl25kyn00y2g1ma9cl3w4cm
    text: Because the access and distinguishability problems arise from disjunctivism's general commitment, ED-M can answer them in ways parallel to ED-P; and because remembering that p need not entail believing or knowing that p, its basis problem is dissolved.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl25tci00yyg1maiapgcfob
    text: Even when no particular episode of learning or memorial experience is reflectively accessible, Michael can have reflective access to the fact that he remembers that snow is white.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl25tci00yzg1ma0a6an3qv
    text: ED-MS requires, in paradigmatic stored-memory knowledge, factive and reflectively accessible rational support.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl25tci00z0g1mai94jc6ij
    text: Milburn and Moon object that stored memory is often unconscious, illustrated by Michael remembering that snow is white while asleep, which appears to create an access problem for ED-MS.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl25tcj00z1g1map7pxhsvh
    text: The sleeping case creates a general problem for access internalists, rather than one specific to ED-MS, since it would also imply that one has experiential-memory knowledge only when not asleep.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl25tej00z3g1maxm0nfs9r
    text: The lack of an experiential component in stored memory does not reduce the rational support provided by remembering; when challenged, Michael can cite remembering that snow is white.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl25tqd00z5g1mau66wokzz
    text: In the quiz-show/Radford-like case, Michael correctly answers that Elizabeth I died in 1603 but lacks reflective access to the fact that he remembers it and may regard the answer as a guess.
    is implicit: false
  scheme:
    id: cmhh1ozxr0003g1lrz880csfq
    key: argument_from_example
    name: Argument from Example
    canonical key: argument_from_example
    catalogue health:
      is argument pattern: true
      is dialogue meta: false
      is test placeholder: false
      canonical key: argument_from_example
      cluster tag missing: false
      fingerprint materialised: true
  critical questions:
    scheme key: argument_from_example
    total: 5
    partially answered:
      cq key: counterexamples?
      text: Are there other relevant examples that would support a different conclusion?
      attack kind: REBUTS
      cq status id: cmsl2dqbg01beg1mau2tpyinc
      scheme key: argument_from_example
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      cq status enum: PENDING_REVIEW
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: pending_review
    unanswered:
      cq key: causal_link?
      text: Is the property F genuinely causally or evidentially connected to property G?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: argument_from_example
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: missing
    unanswered:
      cq key: example_representative?
      text: Is the example cited representative of the population?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: argument_from_example
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: missing
    unanswered:
      cq key: relevant_differences?
      text: Are there relevant differences between the cited example and the case to which the conclusion is being applied?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: argument_from_example
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: missing
    unanswered:
      cq key: sample_size?
      text: Is the number of examples sufficient to support the generalization?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: argument_from_example
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: missing
  dialectical status:
    incoming attacks: 0
    incoming supports: 0
    incoming attack edges: 0
    critical questions required: 5
    critical questions answered: 0
    critical questions open: 5
    standing score: 0.5
    is tested: false
    testedness: untested
    standing state: untested-default
    standing depth:
      challengers: 0
      independent reviewers: 0
      confidence: thin
    fitness breakdown:
      total: 0
      weights:
        cq answered: 1
        support edges: 0.5
        attack edges: -0.7
        attack c as: -1
        evidence with provenance: 0.25
  deliberation: Paper reconstruction — Kwok Chung Him et al. (2023), An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge
    id: cmsl22dp600org1ma1jxfwvq8
  author:
    id: 174
    display name: Paper Reconstruction Agent
    kind: AI
    ai provenance:
      via: agent-key
      tool: propose_structured_argument
      created at: 2026-08-09T00:22:21.253Z
      agent profile id: cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow
round trip soundness:
  scheme key: argument_from_example
  groups:
    ORDINARY:
      cq count: 5
      aif exposure: exposed
    ASSUMPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
    EXCEPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
  lossy: false

cmsl25kyn00y2g1ma9cl3w4cm
type: InformationNode
text: Because the access and distinguishability problems arise from disjunctivism's general commitment, ED-M can answer them in ways parallel to ED-P; and because remembering that p need not entail believing or knowing that p, its basis problem is dissolved.

cmsl25skx00ytg1mareoz3p6l
type: InformationNode
text: Stored-memory cases do not defeat ED-M when the subject can reflectively access the fact that he remembers, even without access to a particular memorial experience.

cmsl25tci00yyg1maiapgcfob
type: InformationNode
text: Even when no particular episode of learning or memorial experience is reflectively accessible, Michael can have reflective access to the fact that he remembers that snow is white.

cmsl25tci00yzg1ma0a6an3qv
type: InformationNode
text: ED-MS requires, in paradigmatic stored-memory knowledge, factive and reflectively accessible rational support.

cmsl25tci00z0g1mai94jc6ij
type: InformationNode
text: Milburn and Moon object that stored memory is often unconscious, illustrated by Michael remembering that snow is white while asleep, which appears to create an access problem for ED-MS.

cmsl25tcj00z1g1map7pxhsvh
type: InformationNode
text: The sleeping case creates a general problem for access internalists, rather than one specific to ED-MS, since it would also imply that one has experiential-memory knowledge only when not asleep.

cmsl25tej00z3g1maxm0nfs9r
type: InformationNode
text: The lack of an experiential component in stored memory does not reduce the rational support provided by remembering; when challenged, Michael can cite remembering that snow is white.

cmsl25tqd00z5g1mau66wokzz
type: InformationNode
text: In the quiz-show/Radford-like case, Michael correctly answers that Elizabeth I died in 1603 but lacks reflective access to the fact that he remembers it and may regard the answer as a guess.

cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26
type: RA
type: argument from example
uses scheme: argument_from_example
name: Argument from Example
applies scheme key: argument_from_example

Premise
from: I:cmsl25kyn00y2g1ma9cl3w4cm
to: S:cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26

Premise
from: I:cmsl25tci00yyg1maiapgcfob
to: S:cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26

Premise
from: I:cmsl25tci00yzg1ma0a6an3qv
to: S:cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26

Premise
from: I:cmsl25tci00z0g1mai94jc6ij
to: S:cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26

Premise
from: I:cmsl25tcj00z1g1map7pxhsvh
to: S:cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26

Premise
from: I:cmsl25tej00z3g1maxm0nfs9r
to: S:cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26

Premise
from: I:cmsl25tqd00z5g1mau66wokzz
to: S:cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26

Conclusion
from: S:cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26
to: I:cmsl25skx00ytg1mareoz3p6l

counterexamples?
type: CriticalQuestion
key: counterexamples?
status: pending_review

hasCriticalQuestion
from: S:cmsl25xl300zdg1max4st2u26

count: 0
weight: 1
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: 0.5
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: -0.7
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: -1
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: 0.25
contribution: 0