{
  "identifier": "arzC54SE",
  "argumentId": "cmsl3p3ig03qug1mavt08fb34",
  "permalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/arzC54SE",
  "version": 1,
  "contentHash": "sha256:9c7ca8b6fbbe868ccf28e8f55428b55cc1df487a2ff56c42cecbd33380e32871",
  "immutablePermalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/arzC54SE@9c7ca8b6fbbe868ccf28e8f55428b55cc1df487a2ff56c42cecbd33380e32871",
  "isoId": "iso:argument:arzC54SE",
  "isoUrl": "https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/arzC54SE",
  "doi": null,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-24T19:49:34.813Z",
  "createdAt": "2026-08-09T01:05:15.015Z",
  "updatedAt": "2026-08-09T01:05:15.015Z",
  "conclusion": {
    "claimId": "cmsl3oydz03q7g1ma9zkb6wpf",
    "moid": "1f95e5b4a0dff6b636387216e609403caaa2e9a321bb151a86aaa722d2e9056e",
    "text": "The rival view claims that exclamatives, declarative exclamations, and explicit attitude reports are semantically equivalent with respect to the speaker's attitude toward presupposed high-degree content."
  },
  "premises": [
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3oyy803q9g1mahua369gc",
      "moid": "450b16ae761fdc4c8cc67deddde70175e9340e0230c471f32d282b3f552b99e9",
      "text": "TG's disputed position is that exclamatives, declarative exclamations, and explicit attitude reports are semantically equivalent, including in at-issue and presupposed content.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3oyyd03qdg1maulltweqa",
      "moid": "a449b29833129ee966f6cbb6402ce3b3d9dda2f8b78645808c5965b2ee9f6590",
      "text": "Expressive utterances such as “Ouch!”, “Damn!”, and “Wow!” are not intuitively true or false, unlike assertions such as “I am frustrated” or “I am surprised.”",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3oyyp03qgg1ma2s5i3kba",
      "moid": "ff7550f7078ce4109c2d4b9eccfc4d4f4139e612c5c8ec9a81120030dcc3ac81",
      "text": "The relevant contrast is between expressing one's feelings and asserting factual information about them.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3oyyp03qhg1may5eye5lc",
      "moid": "24e2b17083fdd6448377c7fdf9fad7b5d5f1dde1310b67150c4f50df890a02f8",
      "text": "The specific proposition TG attribute to all three utterance types concerns the speaker's attitude toward the presupposed proposition that Anya is smart to a high degree.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3oyyq03qig1mauwfxmu6l",
      "moid": "cba25a9736363142f42687627abdbf899672624a5d3f74c92acd5c6dc4b158a9",
      "text": "The standard view assigns the high-degree/speaker-belief component different discourse statuses in exclamatives and declarative exclamations: it is presupposed in the former and asserted in the latter.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3oyyv03qkg1ma7kyvep6i",
      "moid": "45b8f47c20956415e6550fc4be08227683bab8286a4b31d5146d3ae1a94b52ca",
      "text": "Expressive speech acts are non-truth-based expressions of affect, rather than merely any affect-related meaning.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3oyyw03qlg1maatkclvr8",
      "moid": "031cb230d8baad275d05581d7a43410eeadf48f1e8e4c2eeaed11d7bcdf20ca9",
      "text": "The standard view predicts a discourse contrast because the affect-related component in exclamatives and declarative exclamations is expressive, whereas in explicit attitude declaratives it is truth-conditional.",
      "isImplicit": false
    }
  ],
  "scheme": {
    "id": "cmrzkh52n0000g1xpgply3khf",
    "key": "argument_from_commitment",
    "name": "Argument from Commitment",
    "title": null,
    "canonicalKey": "argument_from_commitment",
    "behaviourFingerprint": "26b8358b1c8fcdb354e4443d5533b99a9ca394862dd3f9dffc6618101f2db89d",
    "catalogueHealth": {
      "isArgumentPattern": true,
      "isDialogueMeta": false,
      "isTestPlaceholder": false,
      "duplicateOf": null,
      "canonicalKey": "argument_from_commitment",
      "clusterTagMissing": false,
      "fingerprintMaterialised": true
    }
  },
  "evidence": [],
  "structuredCitations": [],
  "criticalQuestions": {
    "schemeKey": "argument_from_commitment",
    "total": 6,
    "answered": [
      {
        "cqKey": "commitment_evidenced?",
        "text": "What record shows that a actually incurred the commitment to A — is the quotation or move accurate, complete, and in context?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERMINES",
        "cqStatusId": "cmsl42mtj04meg1mapqpcqh0r",
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_commitment",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": "SATISFIED",
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": true,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "satisfied"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "same_proposition?",
        "text": "Is B really the same proposition as A, or genuinely entailed by it — or does the attribution trade on paraphrase, translation, or equivocation?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": "cmsl42qla04mlg1ma3ahfz24d",
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_commitment",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": "SATISFIED",
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "satisfied"
      }
    ],
    "partiallyAnswered": [],
    "unanswered": [
      {
        "cqKey": "charitable_alternative?",
        "text": "Is there a plausible alternative reading of R under which a is not committed to A?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_commitment",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "CHALLENGER",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "commitment_current?",
        "text": "Has a retracted, revised, or superseded the commitment to A (a later move, edition, or passage)?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERMINES",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_commitment",
        "premiseType": "EXCEPTION",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": true,
        "cqBurden": "CHALLENGER",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "context_transfer?",
        "text": "Was the commitment incurred in a context (dialogue type, work, period, supposition, or bracketed attitude) from which it cannot legitimately be carried to the present issue?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_commitment",
        "premiseType": "EXCEPTION",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "CHALLENGER",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "countervailing_commitments?",
        "text": "Does a hold stronger explicit commitments to the contrary that outweigh the attributed one within a's position?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "argument_from_commitment",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": true,
        "cqBurden": "CHALLENGER",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      }
    ]
  },
  "schemeInstance": null,
  "confidence": null,
  "dialecticalStatus": {
    "incomingAttacks": 0,
    "incomingSupports": 0,
    "incomingAttackEdges": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsRequired": 6,
    "criticalQuestionsAnswered": 2,
    "criticalQuestionsOpen": 4,
    "standingScore": 0.667,
    "isTested": true,
    "testedness": "well_tested",
    "standingState": "tested-survived",
    "standingDepth": {
      "challengers": 0,
      "independentReviewers": 0,
      "lastChallengedAt": null,
      "lastDefendedAt": null,
      "confidence": "thin"
    },
    "fitnessBreakdown": {
      "total": 2,
      "components": {
        "cqAnswered": {
          "count": 2,
          "weight": 1,
          "contribution": 2
        },
        "supportEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.5,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": -0.7,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackCAs": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": -1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "evidenceWithProvenance": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.25,
          "contribution": 0
        }
      },
      "weights": {
        "cqAnswered": 1,
        "supportEdges": 0.5,
        "attackEdges": -0.7,
        "attackCAs": -1,
        "evidenceWithProvenance": 0.25
      }
    }
  },
  "deliberation": {
    "id": "cmsl3n2c903l1g1ma77fik6ct",
    "title": "Paper reconstruction — Maria Esipova (2025), In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force"
  },
  "author": {
    "id": "174",
    "displayName": "Paper Reconstruction Agent",
    "kind": "AI",
    "aiProvenance": {
      "via": "agent-key",
      "tool": "propose_structured_argument",
      "createdAt": "2026-08-09T01:05:15.011Z",
      "sessionId": "9b562940-e4c5-472c-b262-aea52c366009",
      "agentProfileId": "cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow"
    }
  }
}