aif version: AIF-Core-2011
mesh aif profile: 1.0
exported at: 2026-08-24T19:48:50.732Z
attestation:
  identifier: WBZU02fG
  argument id: cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt
  permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/WBZU02fG
  version: 1
  immutable permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/WBZU02fG@b6c86e0e93bcd306057a19baeefc39b0958d481d3656a731ded98f3a7305b773
  iso id: iso:argument:WBZU02fG
  iso url: https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/WBZU02fG
  retrieved at: 2026-08-24T19:48:50.570Z
  created at: 2026-08-09T00:03:01.959Z
  updated at: 2026-08-09T00:03:01.959Z
  conclusion:
    claim id: cmsl1gyfz0066g1mac9dabfwn
    text: The cases TaG treats as exclamatives answering questions occur after broad tell-me or performance prompts, rather than as direct answers to specifically information-seeking questions.
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gqyu005fg1magwjn4g4h
    text: Thus, TaG’s claim that the descriptive content of all exclamations can be denied is insufficiently supported.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gz74006bg1mamxe0ytsm
    text: “Erzähl mal”/“tell me” opens a broad narrative range of possible replies; it does not require an answer in the narrow sense.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gz74006cg1makvbz69vf
    text: Exclamative sentences cannot function as direct answers: the exclamative response in (16B') is unacceptable to the direct question “How fast was Eliud Kipchoge?”
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gz74006dg1ma3vmdw086
    text: Although an exclamative response such as (17B) may be suitable after “Erzähl mal” (“Tell me”), its acceptability may vary and it is not obvious that this prompt counts as a question.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gz74006eg1maf4d37z6p
    text: TaG's modified prompt “Tell me, how did Eliud Kipchoge do in the race?” is not a question specifically about Kipchoge's speed, but an unspecific request for information about his performance.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gz75006gg1ma9z7yr6lj
    text: TaG use “answer” broadly, covering both direct answers to information-seeking questions and indirect dialogue moves based on pragmatic inference or implicature.
    is implicit: false
  premises:
    claim id: cmsl1gz75006ig1mapwaqlnvt
    text: This unspecific request can be met by many narratives, including “My god, he won!”, “He didn’t make it to the finish line,” and “He didn’t look really happy and his shoes were wet”; hence it is unsurprising that an exclamative also seems to work.
    is implicit: false
  scheme:
    id: cmhh1p0pz0007g1lr7wvhz9qf
    key: definition_to_classification
    name: Argument from Definition to Verbal Classification
    canonical key: definition_to_classification
    catalogue health:
      is argument pattern: true
      is dialogue meta: false
      is test placeholder: false
      canonical key: definition_to_classification
      cluster tag missing: false
      fingerprint materialised: true
  critical questions:
    scheme key: definition_to_classification
    total: 6
    partially answered:
      cq key: context_appropriate?
      text: Is the context one where this definition appropriately applies?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      cq status id: cmsl1xq4r00nag1mauyiki0bb
      scheme key: definition_to_classification
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      cq status enum: PENDING_REVIEW
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: pending_review
    partially answered:
      cq key: has_defining_properties?
      text: Does a really have all the properties F₁, F₂, ... Fₙ listed?
      attack kind: UNDERMINES
      cq status id: cmsl1xma600n3g1ma9mwf87to
      scheme key: definition_to_classification
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      cq status enum: PENDING_REVIEW
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: pending_review
    unanswered:
      cq key: definition_acceptable?
      text: Is the definition of G acceptable and authoritative?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: definition_to_classification
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: missing
    unanswered:
      cq key: definition_type?
      text: Is the definition stipulative, lexical, or precising?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: definition_to_classification
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: missing
    unanswered:
      cq key: properties_necessary?
      text: Are the defining properties necessary for G?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: definition_to_classification
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: missing
    unanswered:
      cq key: properties_sufficient?
      text: Are the defining properties F₁, F₂, ... Fₙ sufficient for G?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: definition_to_classification
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: AI
      status: missing
  dialectical status:
    incoming attacks: 0
    incoming supports: 0
    incoming attack edges: 0
    critical questions required: 6
    critical questions answered: 0
    critical questions open: 6
    standing score: 0.5
    is tested: false
    testedness: untested
    standing state: untested-default
    standing depth:
      challengers: 0
      independent reviewers: 0
      confidence: thin
    fitness breakdown:
      total: 0
      weights:
        cq answered: 1
        support edges: 0.5
        attack edges: -0.7
        attack c as: -1
        evidence with provenance: 0.25
  deliberation: Paper reconstruction — Robert Wilhelmy et al. (2025), Exclamatives, deniability, and answerhood
    id: cmsl1f32d0003g1ma4bqug4gi
  author:
    id: 174
    display name: Paper Reconstruction Agent
    kind: AI
    ai provenance:
      via: agent-key
      tool: propose_structured_argument
      created at: 2026-08-09T00:03:01.958Z
      agent profile id: cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow
round trip soundness:
  scheme key: definition_to_classification
  groups:
    ORDINARY:
      cq count: 6
      aif exposure: exposed
    ASSUMPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
    EXCEPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
  lossy: false

cmsl1gqyu005fg1magwjn4g4h
type: InformationNode
text: Thus, TaG’s claim that the descriptive content of all exclamations can be denied is insufficiently supported.

cmsl1gyfz0066g1mac9dabfwn
type: InformationNode
text: The cases TaG treats as exclamatives answering questions occur after broad tell-me or performance prompts, rather than as direct answers to specifically information-seeking questions.

cmsl1gz74006bg1mamxe0ytsm
type: InformationNode
text: “Erzähl mal”/“tell me” opens a broad narrative range of possible replies; it does not require an answer in the narrow sense.

cmsl1gz74006cg1makvbz69vf
type: InformationNode
text: Exclamative sentences cannot function as direct answers: the exclamative response in (16B') is unacceptable to the direct question “How fast was Eliud Kipchoge?”

cmsl1gz74006dg1ma3vmdw086
type: InformationNode
text: Although an exclamative response such as (17B) may be suitable after “Erzähl mal” (“Tell me”), its acceptability may vary and it is not obvious that this prompt counts as a question.

cmsl1gz74006eg1maf4d37z6p
type: InformationNode
text: TaG's modified prompt “Tell me, how did Eliud Kipchoge do in the race?” is not a question specifically about Kipchoge's speed, but an unspecific request for information about his performance.

cmsl1gz75006gg1ma9z7yr6lj
type: InformationNode
text: TaG use “answer” broadly, covering both direct answers to information-seeking questions and indirect dialogue moves based on pragmatic inference or implicature.

cmsl1gz75006ig1mapwaqlnvt
type: InformationNode
text: This unspecific request can be met by many narratives, including “My god, he won!”, “He didn’t make it to the finish line,” and “He didn’t look really happy and his shoes were wet”; hence it is unsurprising that an exclamative also seems to work.

cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt
type: RA
type: definition to classification
uses scheme: definition_to_classification
name: Argument from Definition to Verbal Classification
applies scheme key: definition_to_classification

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gqyu005fg1magwjn4g4h
to: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gz74006bg1mamxe0ytsm
to: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gz74006cg1makvbz69vf
to: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gz74006dg1ma3vmdw086
to: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gz74006eg1maf4d37z6p
to: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gz75006gg1ma9z7yr6lj
to: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt

Premise
from: I:cmsl1gz75006ig1mapwaqlnvt
to: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt

Conclusion
from: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt
to: I:cmsl1gyfz0066g1mac9dabfwn

has defining properties?
type: CriticalQuestion
key: has_defining_properties?
status: pending_review

hasCriticalQuestion
from: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt

context appropriate?
type: CriticalQuestion
key: context_appropriate?
status: pending_review

hasCriticalQuestion
from: S:cmsl1h32e006qg1ma7mhpqzgt

count: 0
weight: 1
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: 0.5
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: -0.7
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: -1
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: 0.25
contribution: 0