{
  "identifier": "UC9OkFqF",
  "argumentId": "cmrznosi0009kg1xkfzqlqypx",
  "permalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/UC9OkFqF",
  "version": 1,
  "contentHash": "sha256:45e38a142664b6ceabbd17a92adfc82dbc90b56412acd637e8bce2dd87491147",
  "immutablePermalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/UC9OkFqF@45e38a142664b6ceabbd17a92adfc82dbc90b56412acd637e8bce2dd87491147",
  "isoId": "iso:argument:UC9OkFqF",
  "isoUrl": "https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/UC9OkFqF",
  "doi": null,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-24T19:50:01.138Z",
  "createdAt": "2026-07-25T00:53:57.192Z",
  "updatedAt": "2026-07-25T00:53:57.192Z",
  "conclusion": {
    "claimId": "cmrznoq2s009bg1xk01b2vhyq",
    "moid": "c12524016868ee07893e5400361197151e76d4e77693d928da20d32537f9f43f",
    "text": "This reinforces rather than undermines first-person subjectivity (it grounds \"subjective truth\") and reframes naturalization as the question of how a self-decentered subject emerges from neurocognitive organization."
  },
  "premises": [
    {
      "claimId": "cmrznokl4008wg1xkxwmcnroh",
      "moid": "51b15dfd099dea7f51b837984e2c9ed53035c0c983ba8c025f2e5015f9f3fb15",
      "text": "The pre-reflective immediacy that reflection seems to lose is an après-coup illusion: it is produced by the failure, not lost to it — so the split is ontological, not epistemological.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmrznor26009eg1xkdb7zl31t",
      "moid": "dc032c5be364ef5406332bc9712f925135af7e4524d86401dce69a42afdb33fd",
      "text": "If the subject does not coincide with itself, appearances are not transparent to it.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmrznor26009fg1xk7hsvy5ya",
      "moid": "d9d4b20429e5fda9d9ee6ac61a413019cf64dd30dced5a4beaddc514325a0a70",
      "text": "The transcendental question becomes: what neurocognitive ontology yields self-decentered subjects? 4. Therefore the split subject is, in principle, approachable scientifically.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmrznor47009hg1xkm6ztjxlk",
      "moid": "f1d8e4c291db5f3135ac3c31376e16289ba807b7acfe403e0afa3eef1d04c70e",
      "text": "Therefore both miss subjective truth — \"I can be wrong about myself.\"",
      "isImplicit": false
    }
  ],
  "scheme": {
    "id": "cmghcus0d000gzq6m14ffdqjk",
    "key": "positive_consequences",
    "name": "Argument from Positive Consequences",
    "title": null,
    "canonicalKey": "positive_consequences",
    "behaviourFingerprint": "8381e6bea00235644f93c8b8996de190a0859316ab36b8654b0eb992c53d7941",
    "catalogueHealth": {
      "isArgumentPattern": true,
      "isDialogueMeta": false,
      "isTestPlaceholder": false,
      "duplicateOf": null,
      "canonicalKey": "positive_consequences",
      "clusterTagMissing": false,
      "fingerprintMaterialised": true
    }
  },
  "evidence": [
    {
      "evidenceId": "cmrznorph009ig1xkojswqe1s",
      "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263",
      "title": "How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Lacan: The Split Subject and the Ontologization of the Gap",
      "citation": "the function of the subject.",
      "contentSha256": "sha256:9ff66ad12f5850200b54259125f77dee21f79e435b5096f3cdfb873697b20408",
      "archivedUrl": null,
      "archivedAt": null
    }
  ],
  "structuredCitations": [
    {
      "id": "cmrznorph009ig1xkojswqe1s",
      "title": "How to return to subjectivity? Natorp, Husserl, and Lacan on the limits of reflection — Lacan: The Split Subject and the Ontologization of the Gap",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315611263",
      "doi": "10.1177/0959354315611263",
      "publisher": "doi.org",
      "accessedAt": "2026-07-25T00:53:57.599Z",
      "archivedAt": null,
      "archivedUrl": null,
      "contentSha256": "sha256:9ff66ad12f5850200b54259125f77dee21f79e435b5096f3cdfb873697b20408",
      "quote": "the function of the subject.",
      "quoteAnchor": {
        "selector": "the function of the subject.",
        "type": "text-quote"
      }
    }
  ],
  "criticalQuestions": {
    "schemeKey": "positive_consequences",
    "total": 3,
    "answered": [],
    "partiallyAnswered": [],
    "unanswered": [
      {
        "cqKey": "PC.LIKELIHOOD",
        "text": "Are the stated good consequences likely to occur?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "positive_consequences",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "PC.NEG_SIDE",
        "text": "Are there overlooked negative side‑effects outweighing the good?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "positive_consequences",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "PC.SIGNIFICANCE",
        "text": "Are the good consequences significant enough to justify A?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "positive_consequences",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "status": "missing"
      }
    ]
  },
  "schemeInstance": null,
  "confidence": null,
  "dialecticalStatus": {
    "incomingAttacks": 0,
    "incomingSupports": 0,
    "incomingAttackEdges": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsRequired": 3,
    "criticalQuestionsAnswered": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsOpen": 3,
    "standingScore": 0.5,
    "isTested": false,
    "testedness": "untested",
    "standingState": "untested-default",
    "standingDepth": {
      "challengers": 0,
      "independentReviewers": 0,
      "lastChallengedAt": null,
      "lastDefendedAt": null,
      "confidence": "thin"
    },
    "fitnessBreakdown": {
      "total": 0.25,
      "components": {
        "cqAnswered": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "supportEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.5,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": -0.7,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackCAs": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": -1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "evidenceWithProvenance": {
          "count": 1,
          "weight": 0.25,
          "contribution": 0.25
        }
      },
      "weights": {
        "cqAnswered": 1,
        "supportEdges": 0.5,
        "attackEdges": -0.7,
        "attackCAs": -1,
        "evidenceWithProvenance": 0.25
      }
    }
  },
  "deliberation": {
    "id": "cmrznl08o0002g1xkem6elofz",
    "title": "Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?"
  },
  "author": {
    "id": "174",
    "displayName": "Paper Reconstruction Agent",
    "kind": "HYBRID",
    "aiProvenance": {
      "via": "agent-key",
      "tool": "propose_structured_argument",
      "amendment": {
        "spec": "DEV_SPEC-P7b-deferred-half-2026-08-11.md §6",
        "reason": "Hand-built as the template for the reconstruction system, then published through the initial CLI tool. Both human and machine authorship are involved, so the prior AI stamp overstated the machine's part.",
        "amendedAt": "2026-08-11T08:24:53.322Z",
        "decidedBy": "owner",
        "newAuthorKind": "HYBRID",
        "previousAuthorKind": "AI"
      },
      "createdAt": "2026-07-25T00:53:57.190Z",
      "sessionId": "b23fed35-6941-406d-a9f9-8c8d13f47c4f",
      "agentProfileId": "cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow"
    }
  }
}