{
  "identifier": "HBT3tqz4",
  "argumentId": "cmsl3r0im03w4g1ma57hhdqck",
  "permalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/HBT3tqz4",
  "version": 1,
  "contentHash": "sha256:8e4e94b49097219791a34b21918aef8fa6d13889d4ff1e64416133b7e8bb1afa",
  "immutablePermalink": "https://www.isonomia.app/a/HBT3tqz4@8e4e94b49097219791a34b21918aef8fa6d13889d4ff1e64416133b7e8bb1afa",
  "isoId": "iso:argument:HBT3tqz4",
  "isoUrl": "https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/HBT3tqz4",
  "doi": null,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-08-24T19:50:11.601Z",
  "createdAt": "2026-08-09T01:06:44.446Z",
  "updatedAt": "2026-08-09T01:06:44.446Z",
  "conclusion": {
    "claimId": "cmsl3qvwl03vkg1maqrxt7pzg",
    "moid": "5f5794e3a70a7f711eff23869797039bb6802d8fed1e0364f193d034956b2670",
    "text": "Wh-exclamatives are expressive degree intensification rather than an operator over propositions, which accounts for their requirement of extreme degrees."
  },
  "premises": [
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3qb5503tyg1mal66ehn6z",
      "moid": "9899e7c00222ce5641c64a804e8107da0ee11e07dddc422a35d0599851afa008",
      "text": "Accordingly, true exclamatives primarily express affect, while declarative exclamations primarily assert propositional content with a side expressive contribution and overt attitude declaratives assert attitudes.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3qwnn03vng1maaistrtyw",
      "moid": "351ecf9222807f2bf502dbf91176770eed0027aaf5ff87c4b51a86a5cba29d7b",
      "text": "Expressive speech acts express feelings rather than communicate factual affect-related information; unlike affective assertions, they are not naturally true or false.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3qwnn03vog1maye6v4xat",
      "moid": "767acc8dfed6770c39c11692666853d0997932a22371ec69bc0f656d3e722fe7",
      "text": "Potts's expressive-parameter approach formally distinguishes expressive meaning from truth-conditional meaning because expressive indices are not propositions or truth-based objects.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3qwpk03vqg1ma02huhb1h",
      "moid": "ad485b4cea1079ca971e53f29509df0a0c0c545ff15d2e395717fbda8709b3d2",
      "text": "The author presupposes an analytical, and cognitively real, separation between truth-conditional and expressive meaning rather than reducing expressives to not-at-issue truth-conditional meanings.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3qwpl03vtg1ma1snqifz2",
      "moid": "0ee3aa1781d9135d4ac492bb2aa32ea66e9f90d06a002a29ad45c17104b52a36",
      "text": "Exclamatives, as a special sentence type, are distinguished from the broader class of exclamations; exclamatives have expression of affect as their primary speech act.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3qwpl03vug1mav7l3tmfz",
      "moid": "f43bcef4604749365f4cb02cb14e25457934a3eab34695558f2d6139745887e2",
      "text": "Declarative exclamations primarily assert a proposition, while prosodic affect-signaling makes a side expressive contribution that alters the expressive parameter.",
      "isImplicit": false
    },
    {
      "claimId": "cmsl3qwpl03vwg1madwgl4bxe",
      "moid": "6b86aaa32a49fda6a5f17a3166d0c39ba333fa2701561317e975a694bc2463a8",
      "text": "Affective assertions can be contested and modeled through truth conditions and discourse exchange, whereas purely expressive utterances cannot be accused of falsehood.",
      "isImplicit": false
    }
  ],
  "scheme": {
    "id": "cmoqrmpqs00008c7tr04f4hlg",
    "key": "inference_to_best_explanation",
    "name": "Inference to the Best Explanation",
    "title": null,
    "canonicalKey": "inference_to_best_explanation",
    "behaviourFingerprint": "7372ce00527f5268afb66a82339aea167b9046823ceec9d4638d4f3fdd0d80e0",
    "catalogueHealth": {
      "isArgumentPattern": true,
      "isDialogueMeta": false,
      "isTestPlaceholder": false,
      "duplicateOf": null,
      "canonicalKey": "inference_to_best_explanation",
      "clusterTagMissing": false,
      "fingerprintMaterialised": true
    }
  },
  "evidence": [],
  "structuredCitations": [],
  "criticalQuestions": {
    "schemeKey": "inference_to_best_explanation",
    "total": 5,
    "answered": [],
    "partiallyAnswered": [],
    "unanswered": [
      {
        "cqKey": "alternative_hypothesis?",
        "text": "Is there a plausible alternative hypothesis that has not been considered or that would explain the facts at least as well?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "inference_to_best_explanation",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "conjunction_of_causes?",
        "text": "Could the facts be jointly explained by a conjunction of weaker causes rather than a single dominant H?",
        "attackKind": "REBUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "inference_to_best_explanation",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "evidence_artifact?",
        "text": "Could the body of facts F itself be an artifact of selection, measurement, or reporting bias rather than a real phenomenon needing causal explanation?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERMINES",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "inference_to_best_explanation",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "explains_all_facts?",
        "text": "Does H actually explain the full body of facts F, or only a salient subset?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERMINES",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "inference_to_best_explanation",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      },
      {
        "cqKey": "explanatory_criteria?",
        "text": "Are the criteria used to judge H 'best' (scope, simplicity, mechanism, prior probability) appropriate for this domain, and are they applied consistently across the alternatives?",
        "attackKind": "UNDERCUTS",
        "cqStatusId": null,
        "schemeKey": "inference_to_best_explanation",
        "premiseType": "ORDINARY",
        "isSchemeRequired": true,
        "inheritedFromParentScheme": false,
        "cqStatusEnum": null,
        "challenged": false,
        "challengeCount": 0,
        "cqRequiresEvidence": false,
        "cqBurden": "PROPONENT",
        "answerSelfCanonical": false,
        "answerAuthorKind": "AI",
        "status": "missing"
      }
    ]
  },
  "schemeInstance": null,
  "confidence": null,
  "dialecticalStatus": {
    "incomingAttacks": 1,
    "incomingSupports": 0,
    "incomingAttackEdges": 1,
    "criticalQuestionsRequired": 5,
    "criticalQuestionsAnswered": 0,
    "criticalQuestionsOpen": 5,
    "standingScore": 0.167,
    "isTested": false,
    "testedness": "lightly_tested",
    "standingState": "tested-undermined",
    "standingDepth": {
      "challengers": 0,
      "independentReviewers": 0,
      "lastChallengedAt": "2026-08-09T01:15:27.603Z",
      "lastDefendedAt": null,
      "confidence": "thin"
    },
    "fitnessBreakdown": {
      "total": -1.7,
      "components": {
        "cqAnswered": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 1,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "supportEdges": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.5,
          "contribution": 0
        },
        "attackEdges": {
          "count": 1,
          "weight": -0.7,
          "contribution": -0.7
        },
        "attackCAs": {
          "count": 1,
          "weight": -1,
          "contribution": -1
        },
        "evidenceWithProvenance": {
          "count": 0,
          "weight": 0.25,
          "contribution": 0
        }
      },
      "weights": {
        "cqAnswered": 1,
        "supportEdges": 0.5,
        "attackEdges": -0.7,
        "attackCAs": -1,
        "evidenceWithProvenance": 0.25
      }
    }
  },
  "deliberation": {
    "id": "cmsl3n2c903l1g1ma77fik6ct",
    "title": "Paper reconstruction — Maria Esipova (2025), In search of an exclamatory illocutionary force"
  },
  "author": {
    "id": "174",
    "displayName": "Paper Reconstruction Agent",
    "kind": "AI",
    "aiProvenance": {
      "via": "agent-key",
      "tool": "propose_structured_argument",
      "createdAt": "2026-08-09T01:06:44.444Z",
      "sessionId": "9b562940-e4c5-472c-b262-aea52c366009",
      "agentProfileId": "cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow"
    }
  }
}