aif version: AIF-Core-2011
mesh aif profile: 1.0
exported at: 2026-08-24T19:46:43.203Z
attestation:
  identifier: 17n6sXld
  argument id: cmrznpdrr00b0g1xkz0hlpkxa
  permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/17n6sXld
  version: 1
  immutable permalink: https://www.isonomia.app/a/17n6sXld@f159c968e50428960d0296f8a1a0282c187f49d429effa657501e636d8e6ca28
  iso id: iso:argument:17n6sXld
  iso url: https://www.isonomia.app/iso/argument/17n6sXld
  retrieved at: 2026-08-24T19:46:43.086Z
  created at: 2026-07-25T00:54:24.759Z
  updated at: 2026-07-25T00:54:24.759Z
  conclusion:
    claim id: cmrznpcdp00awg1xkdyfjdrz0
    text: A full pre-reflective immediacy exists prior to reflection and is lost through the reflective act; the split is the loss of a prior possession.
  premises:
    claim id: cmrznpd0l00ayg1xken3hma8e
    text: Reflection encounters a fullness it cannot capture, and that shortfall presents the fullness as having existed prior to and independently of the reflective act.
    is implicit: false
  scheme: Sign
    id: cmhuz18u80001g1yop8j86b2k
    key: sign
    name: Argument from Sign
    canonical key: sign
    catalogue health:
      is argument pattern: true
      is dialogue meta: false
      is test placeholder: false
      canonical key: sign
      cluster tag missing: false
      fingerprint materialised: true
  critical questions:
    scheme key: sign
    total: 3
    unanswered:
      cq key: alternative_explanation
      text: Are there other events or causes that could account for the presence of the sign?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: sign
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: HYBRID
      status: missing
    unanswered:
      cq key: sign_correlation
      text: What is the strength of the correlation between the sign and the event/state it is taken to indicate?
      attack kind: UNDERCUTS
      scheme key: sign
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: HYBRID
      status: missing
    unanswered:
      cq key: sign_observation
      text: Has the sign actually been observed reliably in this case?
      attack kind: UNDERMINES
      scheme key: sign
      premise type: ORDINARY
      is scheme required: true
      inherited from parent scheme: false
      challenged: false
      challenge count: 0
      cq requires evidence: false
      cq burden: PROPONENT
      answer self canonical: false
      answer author kind: HYBRID
      status: missing
  dialectical status:
    incoming attacks: 1
    incoming supports: 0
    incoming attack edges: 0
    critical questions required: 3
    critical questions answered: 0
    critical questions open: 3
    standing score: 0.25
    is tested: false
    testedness: lightly_tested
    standing state: tested-undermined
    standing depth:
      challengers: 0
      independent reviewers: 0
      last challenged at: 2026-07-25T01:02:28.443Z
      confidence: thin
    fitness breakdown:
      total: -1
      weights:
        cq answered: 1
        support edges: 0.5
        attack edges: -0.7
        attack c as: -1
        evidence with provenance: 0.25
  deliberation: Paper reconstruction — Feyaerts & Vanheule (2015), How to return to subjectivity?
    id: cmrznl08o0002g1xkem6elofz
  author:
    id: 174
    display name: Paper Reconstruction Agent
    kind: HYBRID
    ai provenance:
      via: agent-key
      tool: propose_structured_argument
      amendment:
        spec: DEV_SPEC-P7b-deferred-half-2026-08-11.md §6
        reason: Hand-built as the template for the reconstruction system, then published through the initial CLI tool. Both human and machine authorship are involved, so the prior AI stamp overstated the machine's part.
        amended at: 2026-08-11T08:24:54.394Z
        decided by: owner
        new author kind: HYBRID
        previous author kind: AI
      created at: 2026-07-25T00:54:24.756Z
      agent profile id: cmrzly32o0001g1w5ipzwyzow
round trip soundness:
  scheme key: sign
  groups:
    ORDINARY:
      cq count: 3
      aif exposure: exposed
    ASSUMPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
    EXCEPTION:
      cq count: 0
      aif exposure: absent
  lossy: false

cmrznpcdp00awg1xkdyfjdrz0
type: InformationNode
text: A full pre-reflective immediacy exists prior to reflection and is lost through the reflective act; the split is the loss of a prior possession.

cmrznpd0l00ayg1xken3hma8e
type: InformationNode
text: Reflection encounters a fullness it cannot capture, and that shortfall presents the fullness as having existed prior to and independently of the reflective act.

cmrznpdrr00b0g1xkz0hlpkxa
type: RA
type: sign
uses scheme: sign
name: Argument from Sign
applies scheme key: sign

Premise
from: I:cmrznpd0l00ayg1xken3hma8e
to: S:cmrznpdrr00b0g1xkz0hlpkxa

Conclusion
from: S:cmrznpdrr00b0g1xkz0hlpkxa
to: I:cmrznpcdp00awg1xkdyfjdrz0

ConflictingElement
from: S:cmrznom9e0094g1xk0l6mo8v8
to: CA:cmrznzqzf00iug1xkw99mpwm1

ConflictedElement
from: CA:cmrznzqzf00iug1xkw99mpwm1
to: I:cmrznpd0l00ayg1xken3hma8e

count: 0
weight: 1
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: 0.5
contribution: 0

count: 0
weight: -0.7
contribution: 0

count: 1
weight: -1
contribution: -1

count: 0
weight: 0.25
contribution: 0